MyFox
 

former_detroiter's Blog

by former_detroiter from Royal Oak

Last Post 1 day, 12 hours Ago


Oh censorship I see Fox2! LOLOLOL I write a blog, a very concise, historically correct blog on Palin and Biden`s homosexual stance and it is taken down from here. Freedom of speech????? Some people are just afraid of the truth. I`ll just publish it elsewhere and include that Fox2 in Detroit censored it.
35 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 35
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
LeMay14 read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:11 PM

I missed it. Could you post a link when you have re-posted it?

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:12 PM

Sure will.

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:26 PM

The funny thing was it was about BOTH gays AND unwed heterosexuals receiving marital benefits and a bit of modern cohabitating history and the irony of it. It also pointed out the hypocrisy of politicians dealing with the issue. Especially self professed Christian Palin.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:30 PM

They blocked me also for talking about homosexuality. Mine was regarding Charles Pugh and how arrogant and open he is with his homosexuality. They blocked me from the shoutbox. If Fox News has a problem with people speaking on homosexuality. Then they should have a problem with employing one or more of them. The purpose for these types of chats are to be familiar with what there viewers think. I'm with you that is a violation of freedom of speech.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:32 PM

Homosexuals won't be happy until they have pushed their beliefs on all Americans. It is slowly being force on t.v and everywhere we look. GOD help us.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:33 PM

Is there something that can be done about being censored?

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:35 PM

Shame isn`t it Queen? The door of "tolerance" seems to only swing in one direction here. I could see censorship if someone was just ranting and name calling and being all nasty, but attempting to throw out a logical arguement? Whatever happened to the art of real debate?

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:36 PM

Not on most sites. While this is a public arena they are a private company and can enforce their own policies good or bad.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:38 PM

No one should be entitled to anything unless a will is made. I've been with my man 15 yrs. were not married, so if something happens to me my stuff goes to my children first and foremost. As far as medical he has his own. In the case of homosexuality sodomy is a crime (consentual or not)and their should be no reward for criminal activity, flat out.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:42 PM

But, homosexual politicians will try to change the laws to their benefit. Heterosxual won't stand up to the disaster that society will face in the future for allowing homosexuals to get married. The final result will be devastating on us.

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:46 PM

I agree. A will covers it. But you won`t hear that nowadays. And as far as ownership of things while living nothing stops two unwed people from buying a house in both of their names or a car, opening a joint bank account etc. Power of attorney and living wills also grant benefits as far as hospital visits and medical decisions. Most of the hoopla is just smoke and mirrors as far as rights goes.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:53 PM

Hoopla to make us look the other way while they get married and change laws. Can you think of anything else in this world that is homosexual. There are no gay animals, no gay plants, not even the electrical outlets in our homes are male and female. You wont get electricity without the two separate parts. Only man found a way to be so preverted and destructive upon our society.

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 1:53 PM

About the only thing that can`t be worked around is insurance coverage. But nowadays everyone is having trouble with that. lol

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:01 PM

So when they argue "oh we can`t have this and that" the reality of their deprivation is actually quite small. They have multiple avenues to secure their chosen lifestyles if they so choose.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:06 PM

Insurance co. will remain the same. They don't want to give up the money or anything whether homosexual or heterosexual. Insurance companys only see green. It will cause so many problems to change policy and laws, for people who are living in abomination to society and GOD. Good, at least the money hungry insurance leeches stand up for something.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:08 PM

That is just another way to slowly push their digusting belifs on us and our children.

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:15 PM

The insurance companies and employers are caving in one by one though. Lobbyists in DC are a powerful group. And when you have the present administaration in the White House and politicians like Obama and Mccain backing the agenda as well it`s really a foregone conclusion.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:18 PM

That's just another way to push their disgusting beliefs on us and our children. Our children are innocent we are allowing this to happen right before our eyes. America went to Iraq based on the fact they were harboring WMD's, and it was done to protect Americans. Protect us now. This homosexual movement should be stopped also. Not by killing, but revise the laws and stop the marriages.

DaQueen read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:21 PM

How can we allow this in America? Don't the politician see this is destructive to America. Worse than any WMD's. We need to stop electing homosexuals in office. We don't need a president that is going to bow down to homosexuals.

former_detroiter read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:30 PM

To be honest when you get down to the nitty gritty of things it`s not about economic or civil rights, it`s about perceived social rights and status. It`s been wrapped in an economic/civil rights blanket to make it palatable. That`s why it has been coattailed on the black and womens rights movements. If it were made to stand alone based soley on it`s social merits it would fall as flat as a pancake.

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




former_detroiter

Love gardening, reading, computers, current events and Biblical Prophecy.

Member Since: 1/24/2008