cocoboa's Blog

If you ever had a suspicion of your coworker, take a head count tomorrow. It is the homosexual communities official "Day Without a Gay". In an attempt to stop work productivity the homosexual community is encouraging their workforce to call in "Gay". This may shut down Disney!

What will happen to the gay porn industry....will they operate as the auto industry does when the unions go on strike and bring in scabs to fill the void so to speak????

Tomorrow as part of their orchestrated effort they should take all homosexual programming off the air and give us a reprieve from the relentless assault of in your face homosexuality.  Imagine a whole day without Will and Grace; Queer Eye....what are we to do? http://www.daywithoutagay.org/ 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mew_HYntLaI

This video is incredible!

Still want a bailout?

I agree with rights...but same sex marriage is not one of them.

The reason they give heterosexual couples rights of marriage in the first place is that society needs to promote reproduction to sustain society at current and future levels. Homosexuality does not do this. 

This is not a religious issue in itself. It has other ramifications. We are promoting abortion and we are promoting life styles that do not produce birth. We are also encouraging behaviors that lead to harm of those that practice them. I'm not talking about godly consequences; I'm talking about the Center of Disease control shows that homosexuals have 54% higher rates of herpes.

Homosexuals say that they are promiscuous because they cannot get married....Please...That is just as ridiculous as the argument people have waged that says "the reason priest molest children is because they cannot get married." They molest children because they are child molesters. They were not forced to become priests, they chose abstenance. Nor are homosexuals forced to be promiscuous. 

Those are the dumbest arguments in the world.  If people want to be in a committed relationship, you don’t need my permission do so. Many heterosexuals are committed and not married.  Promiscuity and commitment are choices, not laws.

The fact is the straw man arguments being waged by the homosexual community have no basis in reality. But are in fact hot buttons pushed to play on the emotional rather than rational side of those opposed or on the fence. People form partnerships daily via corporations....they are not married.

Even married couples have to have a living will, durable power of attorney, and executive will and trust in order to not have belongings go into probate. Look at the Terri Schiavo case...they were married and the husband did not have the power to end her life. It took the Supreme Court and 12 years before they took action. Why, because they did not have a will. So the straw man argument of "we are being deprived rights” is completely ridiculous. Write out a durable power of attorney and will and file them at the court house and no court will refuse homosexuals rights of property. Marriage does not remedy the issue of property rights that the homosexual community is arguing for. Legal wills and medical power of attorney will.

If you want me to say I approve of homosexual marriage? Never. But if you want me to recognize property rights, sign the same contracts heterosexual couples need to and your problem is solved. But do not patronize me with these straw man arguments.

Last, the other argument is health insurance. I am not sure that health insurance should be extended for domestic partnerships. People, who are smokers, pay higher premiums than non smokers. Why, they are a high risk. Telling someone they will not insure dangerous behaviors is the free market saying too risky to insure. What the homosexual community is asking for, is to be able to play the slot machines without losing money. But, if the machine hits you want to be able to keep the money. Because you are in a high risk category you pay more period. Not depriving you of rights, just dollars and cents.

I am for capitalism so when it comes to the free market, I am against government intervention, but this is one where I think without it, we’ll be in a great depression scenario. GM alone employs 266,000 people world wide.  Between the big 3 they employ nearly 500,000 employees on the assembly lines and GM alone employs over 30 thousand white collar jobs. Then you have Ford and Chrysler, numerous tire factories and cottage industries that are fed off of the American auto industry. Up fitter’s like Master Rack, Lear, Crown and Knapheide here in Missouri that would then lay off employees. The totals could be over a million that are unemployed as a result of the "Big 3" closing. Revised, here is another startling fact: GM according to GM Facts they spent $197. million dollars in 2007 for online advertisments alone. That was only 50% of their total advertising dollars. That would be a 394 million dollar loss to advertising industries!

What can Bush do? I wouldn’t agree to a bailout if I were the president; what I would do is allow congress to pass the legislation in the House and Senate, then do a "Pocket Veto" where the president does not sign the bill nor does he reject it and it becomes law within 10 days anyway and then his signatures not on it.

What I feel will happen to President Bush, and congress has already done this to him before, where they draft the legislation and say it's a bipartisan effort viola the (Education Bill drafted by Ted Kennedy) then the president signs it into law and they point the blame at him for bailing out the Wall Street and Halliburton buddies. I would rather the bailout be 100% democrat so that they look like they are giving the corporate welfare and Bush and all of the republicans should say so. That is why Pelosi wants the president to push for the bailout so he takes the blame and gives them more ammo.

You know if he signs it, the democrats will say this president bailed out his Wall Street buddies again and didn’t do anything for the middle class when in reality, the bailout would do nothing but save the middle class. The corporate fat cats have enough money to never have to work again anyway so essentially the middle class will be the unemployed on the food lines.

This bailout has the need for a Barack Obama signature, so that the media and the democrats do not use this as another diversion and a way to antagonize more class warfare. Since Pelosi is the one calling for the bailout, let it fall on the democrats shoulders, after all they are the ones that receive all of the Union blood money via campaign contributions. The volatility of the economy as it stands today, there is no guarantee that a bailout will not just temporarily postpone the inevitable and the industry could fail anyway. Plus numerous industries are calling for government intervention while screaming stay out of private businesses affairs.

With no intervention, there is the possibility of a huge catastrophe. With intervention, the possibility of a huge catastrophe remains. Government intervention prevents the normal market corrections from taking place which force companies to streamline costs and efficiencies. 

Your thoughts? 

Stories are now coming out that Palin brought down the McCain ticket. http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?cl=10560
934 

If the Republican Party is going to play the blame game, blame the candidate. If you noticed during the debates on numerous occasions Barack Obama said that he agreed with McCain. Agreed with McCain! So the question is not whether Sarah brought down the ticket, the question should be why was it that when McCain spoke,  Obama thought he heard himself in McCain and said “I agree with McCain as if they shared the same value system…when Obama is the most liberal senator there is? If Obama and McCain agree, there is a serious problem.

When people are given the choice of two liberals, they will naturally go with the one who is calling himself a liberal. McCain was and always has tried to compete with those who were looking to expand socialism instead of securing the base. By the margin that McCain lost by, it was NOT because of the middle of the road the “unwashed”, it was because Republicans did not vote for him.

If you don't believe that to be accurate look at three extremely conservative values based bills that went through: 1. Proposition 8 in California, a state that Obama carried voted to amend the constitution to define marriage is only between a man and a woman. 2. Proposition 102 in Arizona that amended the constitution to define marriage can only be between a man and a woman. 3. Missouri voted to pass amendment No. 1 to make English the official language of government. These issues are what the middle of the road and conservatives voted on, and many of the liberals did as well. So if McCain's loss could be blamed on anything, blame it on the fact that he has sided with McCain/Kennedy, McCain/Feingold, Gang of 14, he voted against the federal marriage amendment.  McCain lost! Conservatism did not.

Frankly those Palin bashers out there, including those in the Republican party are setting themselves up to continue to lose elections if they are going to take their talking points from: Joe Lieberman, MSNBC, CNN, Tim Matthews and Ted Kennedy. McCain turned down a 30 minute "free" interview on the number one rated O'Reilly Factor which would air on the same night as Obama's American Idol vote show to instead appear on CBS Sunday morning and speak to an audience of 3 people that have televisions with the turn dial knob missing and pliers are too hard to use to change the channel..so they are stuck watching CBS. If conservatives want to win elections their answer to problems cannot be "the government” or "McCain/Kennedy was not amnesty".

Last point keeping your eyes on your opponent is a sign of strength and confidence. I did not write publicly about this, but I did send the McCain, campaign that I personally thought McCain lost all 3 debates because he would not stand in confidence and speak to Obama. Plus telling everyone he'll cut pork, but then voting for the mortgage bailout that contained nearly a billion dollars worth of pork did not help him either. Oh, and you must not forget, the “I am going to suspend my campaign until we fix this mortgage problem”, only to show up unprepared for the debate that you were not supposed to be at! Way to keep your word. Too much to cover, not enough time.

Is this the America we want, where our votes are silenced by this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU

http://www.breitbart.tv/html/213313.html

I guarantee this would not be tolerated if they were Klansmen for McCain.

This year we have seen every under handed tactic possible used by the liberals to change the outcome of the election. Busing in homeless people to the polls, people voting in their home state via absentee ballot, then voting in another state that allows same day voting.

I love the fact that people are engaging in the political system and it is being expressed through yard signs and bumper stickers. Last night I set out McCain signs along a stretch of Highway N in Wentzville to show my support, as the liberals have done for their candidates. This morning I came by and the signs were stolen!
Here is the deal, if you can’t compete in the arena of ideas you lose.  But liberals are going out of their way to create an image of McCain losing by taking signs in attempt to overwhelm the unwashed into believing that no one supports the McCain Palin ticket, because there are no signs of support. And I’ll say this, if you have to resort to these slimy underhanded tactics to win, you s-u-c-k! If you don’t find a problem with cheating to win  YOU S-U-C-K.  I don’t care if Republicans lose with fair elections and cannot compete in the arena of ideas, but when you slimy pieces of dung resort to cheating YOU are an embarrassment to the world.    Even with the support of the mainstream media covering for the pathetic attempts to steal an election, liberals still have to cheat to even compete!  

The fact is that liberalism is a mental disorder! If it were not so, the liberals would have immediately denounced the lynching scene of Sarah Palin in the front yard of the California homosexual couple. But, Charles Manson doesn’t think that he’s nuts either so I guess it’s expecting too much to think an ethical denouncement could be made by people who completely lack integrity. 

If you don’t have a problem with ACORN cheating; You are unethical!                                             
                                                       
       If you think William Ayers is a patriot. You are an idiot!
If you don’t have a problem with your party portraying a lynching scene of an American political candidate; you are insane!          

Last, if Obama should lose and there are riots because of the loss; that will demonstrate perfectly the insanity of liberalism. Cheat to compete, and riot when you lose. Those who think Obama does not represent the worst in America, should ask why the worst the world has to offer believes that Obama represents them: William Ayers; Reverend G-D D-mn America Wright; the un-holy Fatherless Flager; ACORN; leaders of the PLO all support Obama. The list goes on and on.

In our lives, we are inundated with advertisements from: third world countries, small town communities, hospitals, Catholic Charities and many other organizations requesting a donation for change under the guise "it's for the children." For example the Missouri kills babies initiative was passed in 2006 under the name "Missouri Cures Initiative “and telling people they need to vote for it to save the lives of children. Then you see the children’s hospitals telling us that you have to give, it's for the children. What a manipulative deceptive practice.

 This proposition is a joke! It is obvious when language says “repeal the current individual maximum loss limit for gambling” and “prohibit any future loss limits” that the slimy casino bosses are the ones behind the bill. Casinos are endorsing this bill! You don’t think so? Try increasing the casino tax with out removing the loss limits. See then if the casinos would be “putting children first”.

 While the people will be throwing their money in the toilet and going into debt with one hand, they'll have the other hand out asking you to support their children because "life just wasn't fair to them." How about no! If you want wealth it isn't the lottery, it's called don't waste your money gambling. Spend less than you make..Buy little save a lot. Oh, no but we should somehow feel good about the sorrow these same losers will feel when they realize they have rolled the dice with the money they should have been saving for their kids college, school books and clothes with many of them filing bankruptcy after a gambling induced high! But remember their telling us, it’s “putting kids first.”

Further, to see teachers asking for more money for schools, when that is where the majority of our taxes are already going in the first place is ridiculous! We are taxed to death for the children. The cities and counties tax for the schools; our payroll is subject to school taxes via state taxes that roll into the schools. The lottery was approved in Missouri "for the schools" and Missouri has some of the worst test scores in the country. In my opinion, they should raise accountability of the teachers performance rather than talking about increasing school spending. Moreover, if you are a parent of a child who is not performing, take a look in the mirror. Could it be that you have failed in investing in your own child, by not helping them with homework, teaching them the abc's?

The arrogance of people to continue to ask for more money when more money is not the solution is asinine. Constitutionally there is no right to public schools. Where do these hacks they call teachers get off doing these commercials stating "it won't cost Missourians." Really, what about when the shlub ends up in a financial crisis after a gambling binge, charged up their credit cards, while knowing they would not be able to pay for it! What about the fact that when you tax an industry the dollars spent in that industry do not go as far! Seriously, to see a teacher say such a stupid remark makes me think, that idiot is teaching and they don't understand where taxes come from. Yeah we won't pay for it at all, that is what they said about the mortgage crisis.

If the country were really sincere about fixing the education system, first dump the National Education Association and privatize the school system and allow industries to get paid off of performance and increase school choice. Moreover, hold crappy parents accountable. The school should not serve as a playground so the so called parents could run off and play while someone else entertains their kids for 6 to 8 hours. There is just a slight possibility that your kid’s knowledge base is a direct correlation of the amount of time “YOU” spend with them. Take Prop "A" and shove it!

Senator Reid blames "Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid from Nevada told reporters the process of reaching a bill had been set back by "presidential politics," http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/WRA
PUP-2-White-House-calls-in-big-guns-as-bailout--JUNCU?O
penDocument    Yeah that's it. Presidential politics. Now the break down was because Reid and the democrats are proposing we pay for the bill. The republicans offered a seperate proposal. Why the breakdown? Because the only ones who think Barack Obama is the Messiah are the democrats in congress. They came with legislation that they (the democrats) and George Bush agreed on and expected that to be good enough. When an alternative bill was proposed that would include freeing up capital gains in an effort to allow foreign investment. It turned into democrats ranting.

Senator Harry Reid is lecturing Senator John McCain about playing politics with the housing crisis. Perhaps before Harry speaks he should refer back to his own housing scandal that led him to a 1.1 million dollar return; triple his initial investment on a house that he did not legally own. "In 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown. The senator didn't disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown's company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally owned the land.

After getting local officials to rezone the property for a shopping center, Brown's company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator's investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale." http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8KMJ8I00&show
_article=1 Yeah Americans need a lecture from Reid.

So yesterday you got swindled by the democrats as Harry talks profited from corrupt lending and other realestate investments. Senator Reid made 1.1 million dollars on real estate investments that he did not even show ownership. Then played the shell game with investigators. Now he talks about the wealthy, how many of you ordinary people made 1.1 million on property you didn't own. Reid is under investigation for other land deals and now he has chosen to screw us on the housing and banking crisis that he helped to create. Senator Reid, Senator Dodd and House Representative Barney Frank should donate their salaries from their last 5 years congressional pay to show that they are not only willing to stick you with the bill they created, but that they are going to dig in and take ownership of their debacle.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8KMJ8I00&s
how_article=1 

On the Today Show this morning, former President Bill Clinton reviews the policies from his administration and the democratic congress to explain who is responsible. Esentially he admits his administration was wrong, but then goes to say the "economy at the time was booming in other areas." That's right, give high risks home loans because the economy is booming. Perhaps that is why it is not so robust today? Hmmmm.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26884852#26
884852

Today Senator McCain issued a statement that "I will suspend my campaign and return to Washington after speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative. I have spoken to Senator Obama and informed him of my decision and have asked him to join me." This was an effort to take action over the housing and bank crisis. McCain also said "I am calling on the President to convene a meeting with the leadership from both houses of Congress, including Senator Obama and myself. It is time for both parties to come together to solve this problem." http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/News/Speeches/Re
ad.aspx?guid=3f8dec5a-52e2-44bf-b665-ebac609433a4
 

So Obama now has 2 choices: 1. Show that he is a follower and not a leader and comply with McCain’s request to leave his campaign to work on a bill, in which case McCain receives credit as the isle crossing "Maverick" and Obama is overshadowed. Or 2. Obama defies McCain’s request and tries to issue his own edict in which case he will be shown for someone who isn't willing to work with the other side. Either way, Obama loses on this one.

This is one of the most brilliant moves I've seen in a campaign. Senator McCain truly deserves credit as a leader as he took the initiative to do something. And to those naysayers who blame Bush and the Republicans for the crisis to begin with. Here is evidence that Bush, McCain and the Republicans and Democrat Allen Greenspan tried to take action for this very reason 3 years ago and were stopped by the democrats. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHj8-HSi5
AA

As a Christian, sharing my faith could not be of more importance. In doing so, you find many a skeptic that insists upon at "the moment of death all consciousness ends" and therefore they live their lives as if Christ doesn't exist! Well scientist have completed a recent study that proves conscious existence after death and cannot explain it.
To the skeptic, there is "new evidence that demands a verdict" -Josh McDowell

I ask that anyone sincere about knowing the truth read the article. It was written by medical doctors that are not implying deity, they are puzzled. There is no bias in the article, so before you live life like God doesn't exist, you owe it to yourself to examine new evidence.

Here is a sample "  if you look at the mind, consciousness, and the brain, the assumption that the mind and brain are the same thing is fine for most circumstances, because in 99% of circumstances we can't separate the mind and brain; they work at the exactly the same time. But then there are certain extreme examples, like when the brain shuts down, that we see that this assumption may no longer seem to hold true. So a new science is needed in the same way that we had to have a new quantum physics."

The bible says that those who seek will find, open your eyes and ears and see for yourself. Click for the full article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20080923/hl_time/whathapp
enswhenwedie

The Warren County Sherrif Kevin Harrison and the county prosecutor Michael Wright have not yet brought charges against Wesa-A-Geh-Ya for the mauling that occurred there on August 3, 2008. The Sherriff's office has stated that the information was given to the prosecutor to decide whether charges would be filed against the owners Ken and Sandra Smith.

In review of the facts, the Sherriff's office has stated on many occassions that there are not many laws to protect the animals or to charge the Smith's with.
So here are a couple: How about attempting to destroy evidence and interfering with an investigation? How about falsifying a police report/false information? These are two laws that have nothing to do with animals and everything to do with liars. If the Smith's were honorable as the Sherriff Harrison told the Warrenton Journal, would they have lied? Sherriff Harrison, why would you say the Smith's intentions are honorable? Calling a liar a man of honor is like calling a wife beater a sweet guy.

So forget about the animals for a minute, because for the sake of prosecution there were several laws broken at Wesa-A-Geh-Ya that have nothing to do with animals on August 3. And the fact that the Smiths are blatantly trying to portray themselves as victims, because they are losing the one thing they care about (the animals) yet they are threatening to dig a hole in the backyard and then shooting the animals; it's obvious that the only thing they are trying to do is outrage animal rights activists. It has never been about the animals to the Smiths, it's been about money. Frankly, I hope they shoot them, it'll spare the animals the fate of going to another toilet like Wesa.

Over the years the Smith's have played a game of deception and it's been pretty obvious that people in the Warren County prosecutors office lack discernment and fortitude to do something with the Smith's and their obvioius game of deception. Sandy told the River Front Times (RFT) in an interview in 2002 "informs the USDA, then cremates the body:"I put it back in the earth where it belongs." The reporter asked about the frozen tigers she had in the freezer and Sandy said "Who told you about that?" she asks. "Only a few people know these things." http://www.riverfronttimes.com/2002-09-11/news/wildcat
-strike/2 In the same article Sandy said "I need it to protect my cats against humans," Tigers walk with her in her spirit, she says'".  I believe this to be true because after Sandy and Ken sold the tigers and lions to infamous canned hunter Steve Galecki, it's obvious they were not walking in this life any longer. The animals needed protection from the Smith's and so do the residents of Missouri.

Last Ken and Sandy said that they were not a breeding facility but in fact a "Sanctuary". Sandy told the RFT "In 25 years, we've had about ten babies." Oh really, Sandy if you simply look at the pictures taken from a fund raiser held in September of 2001, you'll see 6 wolves, 5 baby tigers, 2 cougar cubs, several African lion cubs. This was 1 year and numerous animals all under 6 months old. http://www.ramalion.org/photoalbum/thumbnails.php
?album=15 Sandy perhaps you should stop talking when filled with the spirits.

The Smith's are in fact anything but honorable; they are animal poachers, liars, conmen. Tell the Sherriff and Prosecutor that you are watching the way this case is handled. It's not just about the animals, it's about justice. If Warrenton cannot prosecute those who tamper with evidence at a crime scene, what else are they failing to protect us from!

Not a breeding facility?  Picture from the RFT article:  for the whole article: http://www.riverfronttimes.com/2002-09-11/news/wildcat
-strike/

Contact Warren County Sherriff Kevin Harrison: 636-456-4332

Contact Warren County Prosecutor 636456-7024

Check links for more and to see Ken's mullet.

http://warrentonjournal.stltoday.com/arti
cles/2008/08/06/news/sj2tn20080806-0806war-maul00.ii1.t
xt  http://warrentonjournal.stltoday.com/articles/2008/08/
20/news/sj2tn20080820-0820war-wesa0.ii1.txt