MyFox
 

StooltimeCounseling's Blog

by StooltimeCounseling from Michigan

Last Post 4 days, 23 hours Ago


It looks like there may be some disagreement between the Founding Fathers and the ACLU:

Today's..."separation of church and state"...not the intent of America's founding documents...nor intended by the founders!

Amendment I"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances."

1.  Words "separation of church and state" are not in the First Amendment.

2.  The 90 founding fathers never mentioned even once during the framing of the First Amendment (June 7 - September 25, 1789) a "separation of church and state."  (See Congressional Record.)

3.  The same day Congress passed the First Amendment (Sept. 25, 1789); they approved a resolution requesting President George Washington to proclaim "...a day of public thanksgiving and prayer...."

4.  Thomas Jefferson wrote this phrase, "thus building a wall of separation between church and State...." on January 1, 1802, (11 years after the First Amendment was ratified) in a private letter to the Danbury Baptist Association to assure them that the federal government could not and would not try to establish a national denomination.  Jefferson was an ambassador in France during the time of the Constitutional Convention.  However, while President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson was
also made president of the Washington, DC public school system in which he placed the Bible and the Isaac Watt's hymnal as the two primary reading texts!  Jefferson's phrase was used only twice by the U.S. Supreme Court from 1802 to 1947; and it was not until 1947 (Everson case) that it was taken out of context and given a meaning never intended (first use was 1878 in Reynolds case).
 

    "In matters of religion, I have considered that its free exercise is placed by the Constitution  independent
    of the powers of the General [federal] Government."
        (Thomas Jefferson, 1805, in his second Inaugural Address.)
     
    "There is not a shadow of right in the general [federal] government to intermeddle with  religion....This
    subject is, for the honor of America, perfectly free and unshackled."
        (The Writings of James Madison, Vol. 5, pp. 176, 132.)
     
5.  Applies to Congress, not the states.

6.  First English language Bible printed in America was by Congress in 1782 "for use of schools."

7.  The founding fathers gave speeches, read from the Bible, and prayed at public school graduations.

8.  The U.S. Capitol was used as a church building by the founding fathers.

9.  Founding father judges had prayer in their court rooms with the jurors.
 
10.  A view from the Washington Monument forms a perfect cross.

 Northwest Ordinance(requirements for statehood).SECTION 13, ARTICLE III"Religion, morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged."

(Passed from July 17 - August 7, 1789; during the midst of the framing of the First Amendment, which was June 7 - September 25, 1789.  Please note that the founding fathers used the word religion to mean Christianity.)
 

    "Religion is the only solid basis of good morals; therefore education should teach the  precepts of religion, and the duties of man towards God."
              (Gouverneur Morris, 1792, Notes on the Form of a Constitution for France.)
      Founding father who physically wrote the Constitution, and most active member of Constitutional Convention, spoke 173 times on the floor.
       
    "Why...should not the Bible regain the place it once held as a school book?  Its morals are  pure, its examples captivating and noble. The reverence for the sacred book that is thus early  impressed last long; and, probably, if not impressed in infancy, never takes hold of the  mind."
      (Fisher Ames, The Works of Fisher Ames, 1809.)  Founding father who on September 20, 1789 helped provide the wording for the First Amendment.
       
    "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality  are indispensable supports.  In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who  should labor to subvert these great pillars....  The mere politician, equally with the pious  man, ought to respect and cherish them....  Let it simply
    be asked, ‘Where is the security for  property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert?'  ...And let  us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.   Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds...reason and  experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of  religious principle."
        (George Washington, 1796, Farewell Address.)
  The Constitution of the United StatesPreamble"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
    "I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this  truth-that God governs in the affairs of men.  And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground  without His notice, it is probable that an empire can rise without His aid?  We have been  assured in the Sacred Writings, that ‘except the Lord build the House, they labour in vain  that build it.'  I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without His concurring aid we shall  succeed in this political building no better than the Builders of Babel:"
        (Benjamin Franklin at the Constitutional Convention, June 28, 1787.)
Article I, Section 7"If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law."
 
    "How comes it that Sunday, the Christian Sabbath, is recognized by all the departments of  Government?  In the law, Sunday is a ‘dies non;' it cannot be used for the service of legal  process, the return of writs, or other judicial purposes.  The executive departments, the  public establishments, are all closed on Sundays; ...neither House of Congress sits."
        (U.S. Senate, January 19, 1853, on Congressional Chaplains.)
       
Article IV, Section 4"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government,..."
 
    "...I lament that we waste so much time and money in punishing crimes and take so little pains to prevent them.     We...neglect...the only means of establishing and perpetuating our republican forms of government...
    the universal education of our youth in the principles of Christianity by means of the Bible...."
      (Dr. Benjamin Rush, signer of the Declaration of Independence, A Defence of the Use of the Bible in Schools, 1830.)
     
    "...it is the sincere desire of the writer that our citizens should early understand that the  genuine source of correct republican principles is the Bible, particularly the New Testament  or the Christian religion."
        (Noah Webster, History of the United States, 1832, public school textbook.)
       
    "...the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people."
        (Noah Webster, American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828.)
Article VI"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
 
    "No person who denies the being of God or a future state of rewards and punishments shall  hold any office in the civil department of the State."
        (Constitution of the State of Mississippi, 1817.  Other states had similar requirements.)
       
Article VII"DONE in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth."
 
(Dated recognizing the birth of Jesus Christ:  Anno Domini/Christmas!)
 
    "The religion which has introduced civil liberty is the religion of Christ and His  Apostles....This is genuine Christianity and to this we owe our free constitutions of  government."
        (Noah Webster, History of the United States, 1832, public school textbook.)
       
Declaration of Independence"...Laws of Nature and of Natures's God entitle them..."
    "The laws of nature are the laws of God, Whose authority can be superseded by no  power  on earth."
        (George Mason, before the General Court of Virginia, 1772.)
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
    "Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis,  a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?"
        (Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, 1781.)
"We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions..."
    "We have this day restored the Sovereign to Whom all men ought to be obedient, He reigns  in heaven and from the rising to the setting of the sun, let His kingdom come."
        (Samuel Adams, at the signing of the Declaration of Independence, August 2, 1776.)
"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence..."
    "The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were....the general  principles of Christianity."
        (John Adams, Letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 28, 1813.)
******************************************************
******************************************
"It is impossible to build sound constitutional doctrine on a mistaken understanding of Constitutional history....  The establishment clause [of the First Amendment] has been expressly freighted with Jefferson's misleading metaphor for nearly forty years....  There is simply no historical foundation for the proposition that the Framers intended to build a wall of separation [between church and state]....  The recent court decisions are in no way based on either the language or the intent of the Framers."
     (Associate Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, Wallace v. Jafree, 1985.)
************************************************
************************************************
The majority of the information contained in "Today's...separation of church and state...!" was learned about and derived from resources by David Barton of WallBuilders (817-441-6044), Stephen McDowell of the Providence Foundation (804-978-
4535), John Whitehead of The Rutherford Institute (804-978-3888), William Federer of AmeriSearch (314-621-6446), and Rus Walton and John Eidsmoe of the Plymouth Rock Foundation (1-800-210-1620):
 
     The Truth About Thomas Jefferson and the First Amendment (pamphlet), The Changing First Amendment  (audio),  America, God Shed His Grace on Thee (tract): WallBuilders.
     Providential Perspective (Teaching Journal):  Providence Foundation.
     The United States Constitution and Bill of Rights (booklet), The Real Story Behind The Separation of Church  and State (audio):  The Rutherford Institute.
     America's God & Country (Encyclopedia of Quotations): AmeriSearch.
     Institute on the Constitution (audio and video):  Plymouth Rock Foundation.
17 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 17
Page 1 of 1
Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 4:18 PM

Well the most compelling part of that was when you cited the first amendment that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." That statement is in the Constitution, which is all that matters. You listed some numbers, Ill try to take them in order.

1: "Words "separation of church and state" are not in the First Amendment."

Indeed, the words are not there, only the concept. In fact the First Amendment is much more explicit than "separation of church and state" in its wording. Look for example at the beautiful craftsmanship of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom written by Thomas Jefferson and then ask yourself if you really think that Jefferson and the founding fathers wanted religion involved in government.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Statute_for_Relig
ious_Freedom

2: "The 90 founding fathers never mentioned even once during the framing of the First Amendment (June 7 - September 25, 1789) a "separation of church and state." (See Congressional Record.)"

This fact would only be relevant if you considered the words printed in the Constitution insufficient to read the Constitution and felt instead that you could infer a meaning greater than the words our founders found appropriate to include in the Constitution itself based on anecdotal collected information that you collected with the preconceived objective in mind of supporting a conclusion you have already come to before even seeing the evidence. Such a reading of the Constitution is not a reading of the Constitution

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 4:22 PM

Such a reading of the Constitution is not a reading of the Constitution at all, but instead an imposition of your own will. The only part of the Constitution that was agreed upon were the words that were put into the Constitution. Each legislator who had a hand in writing the Constitution and Bill of Rights and each legislator who voted (both federal and State) for these founding documents and every citizen who could vote for these legislators each had their own intentions, their own reasons, and their own motivations for voting for them so the question arises; to whom do you look at to determine which intentions should trump the language of the Constitution?

I think it can go without saying that that there is no way we can know the minds of every founding father, I think we can all agree that they were not all of one mind, and I would argue that we shouldn't care what they meant or what may be implied in the language because there is no just way to decipher and apply such interpretations and all that should be focused on is the text of the Constitution itself as that would be the only legitimate and objective way to interpret the Constitution. If you cannot protect the integrity of the Constitution then you have no Constitution.

3: "The same day Congress passed the First Amendment (Sept. 25, 1789); they approved a resolution requesting President George Washington to proclaim "...a day of public thanksgiving and prayer...."

Yes, the Congress has violated the Constitution several times in our history. However, the Bill of Rights was not ratified until Dece

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 4:24 PM

However, the Bill of Rights was not ratified until December 15, 1791 which means that your reference took place before the First Amendment was part of the Constitution.

4: "In matters of religion, I have considered that its free exercise is placed by the Constitution independent
of the powers of the General [federal] Government."
(Thomas Jefferson, 1805, in his second Inaugural Address.)

"There is not a shadow of right in the general [federal] government to intermeddle with religion....This
subject is, for the honor of America, perfectly free and unshackled."
(The Writings of James Madison, Vol. 5, pp. 176, 132.)"

These quotes kind of make the opposite point of what you are getting at. The free exercise of religion is "independent" of the powers of general government, they are liberties to be practice by citizens, not government. I would again reference you to the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom to see Mr. Jefferson's opinion on government practicing or financing the activities of religion.

Again, the Constitution has been violated several times in our history and Bibles in public schools was clearly one of these cases. Before then President Adams had signed into law the Alien and Sedition Act making it a crime to criticize the president. Does that means that our reading of the Constitution should change with the actions of our president or does it mean that the actions of our president violate the Constitution? I would say the later is true.

5: "Applies to Congress, not the states."

True, 100% without a doubt...u

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 4:28 PM

True, 100% without a doubt...until the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment says:

"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

6: "First English language Bible printed in America was by Congress in 1782 "for use of schools."

Well first, I highly doubt that nobody in America ever printed a Bible until the government in 1782. I imagine that is mostly propaganda. Again though, irrelevant to the Constitution. You keep looking at this backwards. You keep seeing the Constitution as being in conflict with acts of Congress rather than acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution.

7: "The founding fathers gave speeches, read from the Bible, and prayed at public school graduations."

Again, the Constitution states very clearly that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," making clear that anybody can give any speech, read from any Bible, and pray in whatever matter pleases them whoever they are and whatever they believe without worrying about government putting them on trial for it. As long as they were not making laws respecting an establishment of religion or using tax dollars to fund religion, I encourage them to express themselves.

8: "The U.S. Capitol was used as a church building by the founding fathers."

Should Isl

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 4:31 PM

Should Islam become the dominant religion, would you be comfortable with the US Capitol being converted into a mosque? I am against the Capitol building being rented out. That was stupid of them to do and clearly against the United States Constitution.

9: "Founding father judges had prayer in their court rooms with the jurors."

Again, you are saying that the Constitution is in conflict with public officials rather than our public officials were in conflict with our Constitution. If the Constitution is simply whatever our current officials of a given time are doing then you don't have a Constitution.

10: "A view from the Washington Monument forms a perfect cross."

...and?

11: "Northwest Ordinance"

Passed before the Bill of Rights was ratified. In it though was some of the concepts that would be enshrined in our Bill of Rights including freedom of worship.

12: "No person who denies the being of God or a future state of rewards and punishments shall hold any office in the civil department of the State."
(Constitution of the State of Mississippi, 1817. Other states had similar requirements.)"

Yes, that clause in the Mississippi Constitution is DISGUSTING and TYPICAL of the type of BIGOTRY that was rampant in Mississippi at the time. That along with slavery.

The rest of the arguments are so trivial or hollow that they hardly warrant a response. Republican form of government means Christianity is the state religion? What?

So in conclusion, yes, there is a separation of church and state and it is inescapably linked with

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 4:32 PM

So in conclusion, yes, there is a separation of church and state and it is inescapably linked with the free exercise of religion. Without the separation of church and state there can be no freedom of religion.

StooltimeCounseling read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 9:15 PM

Good to hear from you again, Tim. How's the campaign going? I tried to contact you through a post of yours last month. A few of us want to get together for coffee (or whatever) and discussion. In fact, Shock and I are meeting again this Monday, 9-15-08 at 10:00am. Location is in Chesterfield Township. A restaurant called Dimitris. On Gratiot, just south of 23 mile road. I believe it would be a drive for you, but if you can make it, it would be great to meet. Are you open for this Monday?

Mark.

StooltimeCounseling read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 9:30 PM

By the way, Tim, nice counter point above to my post.

Would you say that subsequent amendments to the constitution changed the founding fathers' original intentions? Or did the constitution clearly provide the vehicle for government to stay out of the business of religion meaning the government ought not establish a national religion?

StooltimeCounseling read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 9:37 PM

Wikepedia does not have an article listed under this URL:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Statute_for_Relig

ious_Freedom

StooltimeCounseling read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 9:42 PM

Oops, my mistake. I used a small letter "F" for the word, freedom. I found it after I capitalized the letter.

StooltimeCounseling read my blog view my photos
Sep 13, 2008 | 9:53 PM

Then again, there's the man, Fisher Ames, who wrote a number of essays critical of Jefferson's followers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher_Ames

You're right with your statement, "I think it can go without saying that that there is no way we can know the minds of every founding father, I think we can all agree that they were not all of one mind ..."

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 15, 2008 | 2:41 PM

"Would you say that subsequent amendments to the constitution changed the founding fathers' original intentions? Or did the constitution clearly provide the vehicle for government to stay out of the business of religion meaning the government ought not establish a national religion?"

Original intentions of which founding fathers? Remember, the King wasn't just the head of the English state, he was also the head of the Church of England which remains true to this day (only now its the Queen). The founding fathers were mostly deists (which was really the most you could do at the time before Darwin, Einstein, and a modern understanding of physics, evolution, and the universe in general) and they clearly understood the danger of government involvement in anything and everything and there is little reason to think that their view of limited government would not extend to religion, especially since the First Amendment is so clear. In fact, the first several drafts of the First Amendment were rejected because they were not secular enough, not clear enough on the separation of church and state.

As I said, I don't (and neither does anybody else) know what the intentions of every founder was, nor do I care. I only care about the Constitution, what it says, what was agreed to. The Constitution forbids the federal government from establishing a state religion in the first amendment and extends that to the States in the 14th amendment. So have further amendments changed the original intentions? If the amendments have, they have only made the separation of church and state

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 15, 2008 | 2:43 PM

If the amendments have, they have only made the separation of church and state even more clear by extending the protections of the bill of rights to the States.

As for Fisher Ames, you will have to be more specific. I write critically of Ron Paul followers, but I think Ron Paul is right on almost every issue.

Oh, and the campaign is going alright. I won the primary, but my opponent who I was supposed to debate backed out of the debate. Pansy. However, Detroit Public Television said they will try to get in touch with him to set up another time, but if he can't then they are going to try to get me on even if it is by myself.

StooltimeCounseling read my blog view my photos
Sep 15, 2008 | 5:07 PM

Congrats on winning the primary, Tim. Shock and I met this morning for coffee. He's still interested in posting signs for your campaign. You may want to contact him again.

On the subject of Fisher Ames, one of our founding fathers, you can go to the following link to get a brief review of some of his written work:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_/ai_3172
557

You were right about the founding fathers not being of like mind. He was more conservative than Jeffersonians, I believe.

In any event, I respect your comment about the constitution, what it says and what it agrees to. That is in spite of the apparent disagreements among the founding fathers.

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Sep 15, 2008 | 5:47 PM

Well thank you very much. Our resources for the campaign are fairly limited and all of our signs are out at the moment, but the campaign's email is kachinski2008@hotmail.com.

Well that begs the question, what do you mean by conservative? Do you mean conservative in the plain meaning of the word to conserve, do you mean conservative as it was understood in a political context at the time, or do you mean conservative in the political sense that it is meant now?

StooltimeCounseling read my blog view my photos
Sep 15, 2008 | 7:26 PM

Read this:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_/ai_3172
557

It may explain Fisher Ames' a bit more. The term, "conservative", meant conservative at that time in our history. The article also described the House of Representatives at the time as, "radical".

Candyo read my blog view my photos
Dec 5, 2008 | 9:58 AM

FUC& ACLU they are most of the reason our country went to liberal nut cases.........

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




StooltimeCounseling

Good day! My name is Mark Rogers. I am a Licensed Professional Counselor and Certified Sports Counselor, Diplomate. I also work on the Human Development Steering Committee and Public Relations Committee with the Statue Of Responsibility Foundation. Google, "Stooltime Counseling", to go to my website, where you can read a number of self-help articles I have written.

Member Since: 5/20/2007