Slowdog's Blog

We do not need to scrap the constution alltogther, we need to Oust the President of the United states, Both houses of congress, the Supreme court justices, and The lobbyists of all the greedy corporations. Then we can sit down and make amendments to the cobnstution (Imagine that being able to change a document like the constution to be able to fit society for the world of today). When you conservative Whackos don't get your way you want to take all the toys and go home it doesn't work like that! There are issues today that were not around when the constution was written, that is why the constution is written with room to grow and Change, Evolve" as you said. Besides Before the constution there was a failed con-federecy your Idea has been tried and It failed! Read your history books.

First of all: I would have figured that "Oust" means not to reelect the incumbent when a seat in congress is up for reelection. The constution is not a popularity contest, you think everthing is like American Idol "Vote from your Cell phone" It is not the constution Says what it says it does not matter who likes or not. Legislation from the bench" you need to quit listening to that Idiot Michael Savage, he will only fill your mind with Hate and contempt. Personal Liberty is not a perversion. You speak of the Articles of confederation being a stepping stone to the constution. Again it is because it failed. There are certin matters that need to be addressed by the federal government, matters like Same sex marriage, and Abortion. These things should not be decided in the supreme court these are a persons Decesions to make amongst themselves, You conservitave cranks can't cry foul! when the supreme court won't legislate morality.

And clearly, the Supreme Court has no Constitutional power to legislate anything, morally or otherwise. Theirs is not the duty of legistlation, but Constitutional interpretation. They, too, [federal district courts more than the Supremes] have overstepped their authority, bypassing the representatives of the people, the legislative branch.

pissedoff702,

The fact that you cannot even spell constitution speaks volumes of the type of person I am arguing with. Perhaps when you learn to spell the word, then we can have a civilized conversation concerning what it stands for.


P.S. I do not listen to Michael Savage.

COCKCHENNY: Why is it when the supreme court bends to the right it is called "interpretation" but when the lean to the left all you cranks, and Hacks call it "legislating from the bench"? You can't have it both ways (although good ol' mormon boys like you probobly want it both ways in more ways than one) You can't have it your way everytime Quit crying and grow up, vote democrat and the U.S.A will be a btter place.

pissedoff702,

Typical of liberal intolerance. The fact that you can only resort to childish name calling only further proves my point that we cannot have a civilized discussion on the topic at hand. You can only make ad hominem attacks because you cannot come up with supporting evidence for your ludicrous claims and effectively debate the issue. Telling me to go back where I came from is typical liberal intolerance, i.e. "I'll tolerate your opinion as long as it is the same as mine." Your kind have no problem with illegal immigrants but those of us who came her legally and obtained our citizenship are the problem immigrants. You make me sick! I would argue that I am more American than you and the vast majority of the liberals in this country that were born here. And you have the nerve to say I want everyone to be and think like me?

If you wish to talk about "slow," you are the poster child of slow as your spelling and grammar more than display your level of intelligence (or lack thereof). Let me guess, 2nd grade? Your evident lack of brain function only proves that you cannot think (or put together a coherent sentence) whether it be independently or following the lemmings of intolerance that define the left. Either way, it is people like you that truly define the ugly American.

You talk about name calling and Intolerance!!! You discust me you freak! Yes go back to where you came from. Don't lecture me on intolerance, you do want everone to be like you Jackass! Some people here in this country have bad tempers, and like to use bad language (Swear words) to get our point accross to people like you, I do have A problem with Illeagal immigrants, and I don't have a problem with legal immigrants, I have a problem with your (Yes You personally) Stupid writings!! I think you are full of BLEEP! and don't want to listen to anyones point but your own, However wrong it maybe. I do value everone's opinion I don't value yours Your a nothing but a worthless BLEEP Why don't you go back to El salvador, Do you really want to start attacking me. If someone has a diffrent opinion than yours you can have a civilized disscussion you don't want that you want everone to agree with and discuss that, that is not freedom, You are not an American, Don't make me give you a civics Lesson Garbage Man!

You have proven mine, People like don't belong here in America you are a peice of S H I T! You want people to be tolerant of your intolerance! You CRANKS are all the same.

Someone said that civilisations only last about two hundred years. I think that person was right; if any civilisation extends beyond that period it is because it is refreshed in some way. For Jefferson this observation is realistically summarised as patriots overcoming tyrants.

Perhaps he was looking at British history, which is cyclical in this way. Jefferson was well aquainted with the history of his ancestors before there had begun to be a history of the United States.

When Jefferson enumerated the faults and tyrannies of a king (George III) whose rule he felt bound to reject, he did what had been done before in the case of Charles I. The Petiton of Right in 1628 complained of the abuses of power of Charles I. This document was followed by a revolutionary war, and the establishment of a republic in England. While the Stuarts were restored after eleven years they had lost a great deal of their power. When James II later began to abuse the royal authority again he in turn was rejected and replaced by the Parliament.

Other imperious English kings who were forced into line were King John and Richard II. Not only was King John forced to sign Magna Charta, but his son Henry III was three times made to swear to uphold it.

Dear Pissedoff,

You had better go back and study up on the purpose of the Constitution. It was not written to protect us from different issues. It was written to protect us from the frailties of men. ie: greed, corruption, dishonesty and any other negatives you would care to mention. All of those things have not changed since its inception. Now, as to voting Democrat and us being better off. If you like your taxes going through the stratosphere, and your looking forward to walking or peddling your bike across country because you can no longer afford to drive, then go ahead and vote your marxist/socialist boyfriend Obama! Before you go calling me a Republican, I am not happy with them either! One is taking us to Hades in a jet plane the other in a fast train! They are all giving us the same political BS. Every good coach on the planet knows that when the team is struggling it is time to get back to basics!!! We as a country must get back to our basic principals if we are to survive!