MyFox
 

QuestionMark's Blog

by QuestionMark from Detroit area

Last Post 9 days, 18 hours Ago


I just finished reading about a woman hitting the jackpot down at a Chrysler plant in Toledo.  Did she win the lotto?  No, something even better.  She collected six figures from one of those phony baloney sexual harassment lawsuits.  She obviously subscribes to the theory:  Why work when you can sue?

When are the feds and the courts going to wake up?  Women like this are not innocent little victiims on their first date or working at their first job.  They don't need a judge to play the big daddy role and come to their rescue.  These women are con artists.  They know exactly how to work a scam.  This game has been going on for so long, I am surprised there are still enough suckers out there to make it work. 

These women are "flim-flam" con artists.  They are actresses.  They pretend they are traumatized by some man asking them out.  It is ridiculous.  They cry.  They tell a sob story.  And somebody actually is dumb enough to believe them?  What ever happened to common sense?  The women get tired of working in those auto plants.  They want  to score a big payoff, a big payday,  that's all it is. 

I feel sorry for Chrysler or Ford or GM, because they are forced  to pay off these scammers.  I look at it as another operating expense, a form of government imposed extortion.  These women should be arrested for fraud, for perpetrating a fraud on a company for personal gain.  They should be doing time somewhere, but instead, they get rewarded.

We need to get rid of these old-timers sitting on the bench.  They should have the word "sucker" tattooed on their foreheads.  We need new judges that are hip to the game.  Sexual harassment needs to be added to the list of frauds and confidence schemes already on the books.  
5 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 5
Page 1 of 1
carolej60 read my blog view my photos
Jul 7, 2008 | 10:11 AM

Do you think Chrysler just hands out money to anyone who hollers Sexual Harassment with out proof? Hell no! You tell a lot about yourself, and up bringing when you make statements like this.

Mikey66 read my blog view my photos
Jul 7, 2008 | 12:14 PM

CAROL YOU MAY BE ONLY PARTIALLY RIGHT , SOME COMPANIES JUST SETTLE CASES AND THE SHARK LAWYERS KNOW IT , I BELIEVE THAT SOME ARE LEGITIMATE BUT THEN THERE'S ALWAYS THOSE THAT WANT TO MAKE A QUICK BUCK AT THE COMPANIES EXPENSE WITH THE LAWYERS RIGHT THERE READY TO HELP AT THE MOMENT SOME WOMAN YELLS SEXUAL HARASSMENT , AND ITS NOT JUST SEXUAL HARASSMENT ITS ALL LAW SUITS , I WORKED WITH A GUY THAT IS THE BIGGEST SUE HAPPY PERSON I EVER MET ,THE COMPANY I WORKED FOR KNEW THIS , HE PULLED A MUSCLE IN HIS BACK AS WE ALL HAVE AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER BECAUSE ITS A SHOP WITH ALLOT OF LIFTING INVOLVED AND HE SUED , THIS PERSON ACTUALLY BRAGGED ABOUT IT AND TALKED ABOUT ALL THE TRICKS HE AND HIS LAWYERS USED WHICH MAKES HONEST PEOPLE THAT HAVE A LEGITIMATE CLAIM LOOK LIKE A CROOK , YEARS AGO WHEN I WAS A TEEN WORKING AS A BAGGER AT FARMER JACKS THE MANAGER TOLD ME SOME INSIDE INFO , IF A CUSTOMER SLIPPED ON SOMETHING WET EVEN IF KNOW ONE SEEN IT HAPPEN THE MANAGERS HAVE THE POWER TO HAVE THE PERSON SIGN A WAIVER THAT THEY WONT SUE AND THEY GET 5000.00 , AUTOMATIC , AND THEY ONLY HAVE TO SAY THERE HURT BUT DON'T HAVE TO PROVE IT

carolej60 read my blog view my photos
Jul 8, 2008 | 11:44 AM

Good Point Mikey! I have been in several situations where I could have sued. I never have! Call me superstitious, but I always thought, suppose I really am injured. I guess I just have a conscious. I also no the difference between flirting and harassment. I don't get offended by simple flirtation, but some woman do, and harassment is harassment! Some woman feel that by reporting harassment, it will only get worst. My husband didn't mind me working as, long as, it wasn't in a factory. He said men didn't have any respect for woman in factories, that it was a mans job, because of the foul language and the things that went on. I kind of agree with him, but the pay was great!

Mikey66 read my blog view my photos
Jul 8, 2008 | 10:54 PM

QUESTIONMARK SO YOUR ANOTHER ONE WHO DELETES SOMEONES POSTS BECAUSE THEY DONT AGREE YOU

shockhazard read my blog view my photos
Jul 9, 2008 | 1:07 PM

The chick wears nothing or next to nothing , and , at the first comment , gets a lawyer . I know the type . They female liberals !

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




QuestionMark

Lifelong Detroiter

Member Since: 4/30/2008