MyFox
 

Patch_W_Adams's St Louis Blog

by Patch_W_Adams from St Louis

Last Post 2 hours Ago


Hahaha..Sorry I shouldn't laugh.  Because I was wrong on something that I Blogged earlier.  I had a theory (conspiracy type) that Obama would lose because the Clintons would make sure he lost so Hillary would run in 4 years.  But I was wrong....

It looks like the Clintons are going to have their cake and eat it too(only Bill would know how to do that)....  They Got Biden to be Vice-Pres (especially since he was talking down Obama and Talking up Hillary through the whole election. I always thought that was weird.)  Now they get to have Obama "Pick" Clinton's old Advisors..hahahaha...Sorry that is hilarious.   How is this Change?  Wait...let me answer my own question...He's a Dem....ok that is change, I'll give you that.  Some would say that Obama is going to try to recreate the Clinton years...Well the BBC says that anyway..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_20
08/7730485.stm

But hey what the Heck, why not.  Who needs to bring in new faces to everything.   But at least it proves my Point about parties.....  No One gets to the Top unless the Party lets them get there.  The Clintons Still Run the Dem Party so it appears.  And Obama is paying the proper Homage.....

Let this be a Lesson to those who want Real Change.....

Next time ..

Vote for a 3rd party.....that's real Change....Anything else..is just window Dressing..

8 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 8
Page 1 of 1
nursegrl read my blog view my photos
Nov 16, 2008 | 12:22 PM

REALLY THAT IS FUNNY i ONDER IF THE CLINTONS DONATED MONEY TO OBAMA CAMPAIGN i THINK THAT WOULD REALLY BE FUNNY.

Chickenkiller read my blog
Nov 17, 2008 | 12:20 AM

Patch, - I'd have to disagree with you on this one. I think there are really two different sets of aspirations at work in the Clinton family.

First, you have Bill who has been there for 8 years, has lots of money coming in from the speaking engagements, lives in New York, and wants to be left alone so he can continue to date.

Then there's Hillary who is stuck in a Senate seat in New York. Has a possible career path to the Supreme Court as the best outcome, but will not have a shot at 2012 and in 2016 will be too old. Essentially at this point she is irrelevant unless she geta a Supreme Court appointment, and if she replaces Ginzberg, you're simply replacing one leftist with another a zero-sum gain.

Patch_W_Adams read my blog
Nov 17, 2008 | 12:31 AM

Yea Chicken but they are talking about maybe making Hillary Secretary of State....

I mean I understand that the last Dem Pres was Bill. I assume maybe Mccain would have picked some of Bush's ex guys who knows.

But it is a bit odd that someone that was supposed to be an outsider that took away Hillary's Race, suddenly happens to pick a ton of Clintons old Staff.. I mean wow..that isn't really change. But again..he is change becasue he is a Dem..but I was under the impression that he was going to do things diff up there.....but hey..I guess well have to wait and see.

Chickenkiller read my blog
Nov 17, 2008 | 12:47 AM

Patch - Secretary of State - nope, don't think that's in her future. At the most, its as long as Obama is in office and anything less is at Obama's discretion. Not exactly a position where she could weild power. A lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court on the other hand IS power!

Yeah, you see a lot of the Clintonistas headed to the Obama camp, but you have to stop and ask yourself if they are: 1)Chicago Machine Cronies or 2)Clinton supporters. Remember, Emmanuel could be considered either, and you know he's giving the 'empty suit' a lot of input at this time.

downtowner read my blog
Nov 17, 2008 | 8:11 PM

Hey patch, stop it, you are taking away President elect Barack Obama thunder. I just finish reading an article on the genius of Mr Obama choice of his Cabinet.

Now I can looking forward of having a Presidential Staff who has the management skills of turning the White House into a Bed and Breakfast Motel.

With your posting I also have a better understanding Of Mr Obama political funding.

The Presidency Staff of the Clinton Era had very creative ways of raising campaign Funds .

The Clintons and his staff in my opinion gives all of us hope of redemption . Hal-le-lu-jah [praise the Lord ].. Is that taking our Lord God name in vain.? Jesus ,I wish I had went to Church.. I hope It not to late for me ....

I promise I will vote for Obama next time....

and please Mr Obama let me win the lottery....

statueman read my blog view my photos
Nov 18, 2008 | 1:23 PM

Patch... finally I read a blog that doesn't reek of Conservative foot shooting Political Incorrectness.

I submit however that the Republicans have a hand in Obama being elected too. After awhile you've got to take a break and let the other guys screw everything up for awhile... or at least appear too. We have a weird form of government that doesn't have centuries of precedent to draw from yet.

I wanted to see a black conservative president first. But I don't think it would have worked. Many on the right literally do destroy the validity of the conservative cause by overweening pride and self righteously critical presentation. I think John Mc Cain actually may have done better if he'd come out put far right fear/religion/racially charged rhetoric to task. The Grand Old Party would do well to learn what humility is. Otherwise it will continue to destroy itself from within with the likes of Sean Hannity and little miniature statues of St Joseph.

Patch_W_Adams read my blog
Nov 18, 2008 | 5:16 PM

Chicken Killer, Good Point never thought of the Chicago Connection, and I don't have the faintest which one is accurate, Chicago or Clinton or Both.

Downtowner, Again never thought of that, is it Clintons funding Obama or like Chicken killer suggest just an all in the Family Chicago Connection. Also lol..Lottery..me next!

Statueman! Long Time!
I agree with the Repubs were acting like..well someone other than Big Government Ploiticians it may have made a difference.

As far as type of President. Personally Color of skin makes little difference to me. Like youself, what that person represents is more important than appearance.

As far as the self rightous thing..I think you see alot of that on both sides. It's just that one party Attributes it to God's will and the Other Government's Will.....One swears to Worship God the Other Worship Government...

I think Mccain didn't have a Chance, I mean he's Mccain. Most of those that don't like the Repubs or left the party is because they were too much like the Dems. There was no difference, which is why Mccain wasn't popular before the election with most repubs but popular with the media and Dems.

Mccain's worst problem was he was Mccain....

At tleast that's my opin on it...lol

Patch_W_Adams read my blog
Nov 18, 2008 | 5:18 PM

If the Repubs were acting like someone other than....lol Sorry..forgot some words there..

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Patch_W_Adams

www.poedpatriot.blogspot.
com......................
"But war, in a good cause, is not the greatest evil which a nation can suffer. War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. When a people are used as mere human instruments for firing cannon or thrusting bayonets, in the service and for the selfish purposes of a master, such war degrades a people. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice – a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their free choice – is often the means of their regeneration. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever-renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other." - John Stuart Mill

Member Since: 4/30/2008