MyFox
 

NorthofDetroitGuy's Blog

by NorthofDetroitGuy from North of Detroit

Last Post 23 days, 6 hours Ago


As I read various articles and watched Fox 2 News regarding potholes, I couldn't help but think is urban sprawl partially to blame?

If you think about the funding of roads, it has to do with the number of miles of road in a geographic area.  The more roads you have, the more you have to repair.  Yet year after year the road construction budget for pothole repair decreases or easily used on a small section of road with "Sinkholes".  I also can't help but think that people living beyond their means, driving big gas guzzling SUV's that lived in houses they couldn't afford in the first place, in what used to be rural areas kind contributed to this mess.

In reality, people could live quite comfortably closer to work, or in pre-existing neighborhoods.  We didn't need new houses that my dad probably would have considered to be mansions.  We even widened or in some cases put in entire new roads based on new subdivisions.  Yet we never really had a booming long term job market in Michigan to support those houses.  We never repaired or maintained our existing infastructure.  Would you pattle a boat into deeper shark infested water if it had a leak?  No, you would try to stop the leak first.  If you couldn't stop the leak, you would likely try to get as far away from th shark and as close to shore as possible.  So, why don't Michiganders do that?  Better yet, why didn't we do that?  The new high schools in the new buildings in many cases have lower test scores then those of older existing schools.

The College GPA of those that have graduated from those high schools is also not on par with the previous older experienced high schools.  

So, what did we get from urban sprawl?  More potholes, less nature, more debt, more foreclosures, worse schools, more waisted gas.  But wait, you get to tell your friends you lived in a 3k foot house for 18 months before you got foreclosed on!

16 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 16
Page 1 of 1
shockhazard read my blog view my photos
Feb 19, 2008 | 7:07 AM

I think it's just a matter of crappy construction , kick backs , political contributions , and heavy trucks .

car7858 read my blog view my photos
Feb 19, 2008 | 9:44 AM

Good point, SDhock; I believe that people choose not to be around the hustle-bustle of any major urban city along with the crime and noise. People like myself choose to live within our means in a quiet neighborhood where the neighbors wave as they pass, the air is somewhat clean, and the businesses are not so crowded and friendly. As for the roads, I believe when they started saving money by using cheaper road materials like asphalt and low grade concrete, the roads don't last as long as they used to. Good post nonetheless.

steveincanton read my blog view my photos
Feb 19, 2008 | 9:58 AM

Still the point does make sense that why build roads if you cant keep up with the roads you already have?

jax276 read my blog view my photos
Feb 19, 2008 | 11:14 AM

Although I'm sure the amount of new roads plays a part in potholes I believe poor construction is the main problem. Cost cutting through thinner cement and lower quality materials are what's mainly to blame. I remember reading an article on how they had sent pieces of the original Davidson Freeway to Washington so it could be analyzed because before it was widened some years ago the pavement was original. The Davidson is one of the oldest freeways in the country and when the road was finally widened the pavement was still nearly pothole free. The technology had been lost. I always forget how it goes, it's cement when it's in the bag and concrete when it's mixed and poured or the other way around.

car7858 read my blog view my photos
Feb 19, 2008 | 1:38 PM

Has anyone noticed that the new asphalt repaving that they use now for our roads & highways actually contributes to more accidents due to black ice? They should have used the concrete with the grooves like they started a few years back for traction in wet or icy conditions; Too much like right.

bacsitdz
Feb 20, 2008 | 4:08 PM

Could it be that the reason we have cheaper construction is because we have too many roads to maintain and not enough money to do it right? Cut back on urban sprawl and mandate mass transit.

NorthofDetroitGuy read my blog
Feb 20, 2008 | 6:32 PM

Bacsitdz you read my mind! I read this earlier and was going to post that exact same thing when I got home tonight. You beat me by about 2 hours.

I was waiting for these replies so I could post this:
In the 1960's the United States spent less then $40 billion. That even includes things other then roads. Today we spend around $350 billion nationwide. That's also adjusted for inflation. The real number is actually much higher. This being said, the number of miles of roads we service is now much higher. In the 1960's almost all roads were 2 lanes with passing lines and zones. Today a large number of our roads are 5 line (2 lanes each side with a center turn lane). This wider lane structure also means that more water has to flow to the drains and there is a longer distance for that water to travel to the sewer. In which case it gets caught in one of the many unsealed seems. By increasing the width of the road, you have also increases the amount of water that gets caught in the seams as well as the number of seams themselves.
In addition, the sewer system is centralized. We now have more water flowing threw many of the sewers because of the milage of roads collecting that water. In addition we have a ton of vacant lots, houses and buildings downtown that also have roads and sewers that go unused. Yet when it rains, the water has to go somewhere when it hits the street. In addition to that, we have houses that have 2-4 bathrooms now. More water with more temperature changes in the sewer system. That is the temperature is consistently warmer because of the la

car7858 read my blog view my photos
Feb 21, 2008 | 12:33 PM

Property & other taxes have gone up with inflation; People in urban communities pay excessively higgh taxes and have the worst roads-Where does all the money really go if they are usuing cheaper low-grade materials to repair/replace roads? It seems to me that some communtities keep paying the bills but the money for roads is ususally the last issue to be addressed. Building a useless $16 million dollar State Police post that wasn't even needed could have fixed the Orchard Lake Road mess, couldn't it?

NorthofDetroitGuy read my blog
Feb 21, 2008 | 8:55 PM

I concur car. I often think about Hall Road/M59. If you think about it, all the people south of Hall Road paid for it, so all the people north of it could use it. That's because many of those communities and subdivisions didn't exist when Hall Road was being built. Granted much of the area is very nice, but couldn't we have re-developed say Masonic and Gratiot? Or How about 12 Mile and the Universal Mall area that is now a developing ghetto. Instead we are almost at the point

car7858 read my blog view my photos
Feb 22, 2008 | 9:28 PM

Agrred North; And another point is that many of the areas become "boom towns" for a few years, then as the new construction moves further out into the rural areas these towns are basically left behind with deteriorating roads. Chesterfield,New Baltimore, and Shelby Township are perfect examples of that along with the entire Hall Road corridor in Macomb County.

whatwhenwhyhow read my blog
Feb 24, 2008 | 2:56 AM

Shockhazard is right, I believe the weight limitations on our roads are the highest in all the surrounding states. Heard it's done for the auto industry but seems senseless to me in light of the fact that they are moving jobs out not in.
Our supposed environmentally conscience Governor should read the articles on how the black top absorbs more water and that contributes to the reduction in the water table. It's probably a factor in the black ice situation too.
How many costs in road repairs could be averted if they were built with the standards mentioned by jax276? The Governor would lose her PR on how these infrastructure repairs create jobs. Anyone know if there are ties to any politicians that get these contracts?

NorthofDetroitGuy read my blog
Feb 24, 2008 | 10:10 AM

I wish this were true, but it's a myth.
Many other states have higher weight limits then we do. In fact, if you drive across country you will see many trucks hauling double and triple trailers in other states.
In addition, federal law now controls the weight limits on the interstate system setting a max to 20k lbs for single axle and 34k lbs for tandem. We have very strict regulation agains tandem trailers here in Michigan.
http://www.agotc.org/images/Truck_State_Weight_Limits.p
df
States may no longer set weight limits below or above the federal limit. This changed in 1974 when the weight limits were raised to the 20k lbs. limit. Some states in the south protested the weight limit change (BECAUSE THEIRS WERE HIGHER), but the United States Congress made them change it in 1982.

NorthofDetroitGuy read my blog
Feb 24, 2008 | 10:13 AM

So, back to the original issue, does Urban Sprawl directly or indirectly cause potholes. So far the answer is yes. Can anyone give factual information that proves urban sprawl has little or no impact? In the future I am considering buying a new house. I am a very ethical person, and am thinking it's not so ethical to live out in the 26 mile road area and commute south of Hall Road when I could buy or remodel a house south of there and get potentially better schools, spend less on gas, and not be a contributor to other environmental and local economic issues such as the amount of money available to spend on road repair/replacement.

patobello read my blog
Feb 26, 2008 | 1:33 PM

I agree about urban sprawl, NDG. Not only because of the factors you mentioned, but the increase in concrete and blacktop, the destruction of greenspace and the additional cars/trucks/etc spewing emissions have greatly contributed to the 'heat island' we experience here.
If any of you are into gardening, you've probably looked at the Department of Agriculture Zones. They help determine if a plant can survive the winter in a particular area. Next time you look at a zone map, notice that the area around Detroit is a 6, while the rest of the lower peninsula is a 5. As sprawl increases, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Zone 6 blot on the map increase at a similar pace.

patobello read my blog
Feb 26, 2008 | 1:36 PM

And the roads? If not for the buildup of outer suburbs, there wouldn't be a reason to increase the roads. I remember when the Van BLEEP freeway (M53) only extended to just south of Romeo, now it's nearly to the Lapeer county line. That's at least four lanes of concrete, bridges, over and underpasses, and the so-called 'improved' crossroads.
With dwindling dollars in their budgets and increased roads to maintain, the county and municipal road commissions are doing more work with less resources. It can't help but make the roads worse.

patobello read my blog
Feb 26, 2008 | 1:37 PM

I can't believe this. I tried to type VanDyke and got bleeped. Guess when I put a space between the words, big brother thought I was swearing. Geesh!

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




NorthofDetroitGuy

I live here....DO YOU?

Member Since: 3/8/2007