Longshot's Blog

So McCain and Miss Brain Dead want to play the association game do they?

McCain linked to group in Iran-Contra affair

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/mccain_iran_contra

Well here is McCain's List. Google the names highlighted to see what they were into.

Name index for U.S. Council World Freedom. Directors and Advisors. 1986

BISHOP JIM (HEARST CORP)
BOUSCAREN ANTHONY T
CAMARDESE N M
CARROLL J.A.
CHENNAULT ANNA CHAN
CHOPIWSKYJ WALTER
CONDON MARY HOPE
DOBRIANSKY LEV E
FISHER JOHN M
FORD LUCILLE G
GRAHAM DANIEL ORRIN
HURLBUT BERT
HUTCHINSON JOHN
JOHNSON W.A. (JOHN)
JUNG SAMMY Y
KNIGHT ALBION W
KUBEK ANTHONY
LEBOUTILLIER JOHN
MCCAIN JOHN S III (R-AZ)
MESSING ANDREW
MORRIS ROBERT (B.1915-09-30)
MORTENSEN RALPH
PARKER JAY A
PHILLIPS HOWARD
POSSONY STEFAN THOMAS
ROBERTS J.MILNOR
ROCHE GEORGE C III
ROTHSCHILD KATHLEEN TEAGUE
RUDD ELDON
SCHLAFLY J FRED
SINGLAUB JOHN K
SLEEPER RAYMOND S (COL)
SOLOMON GERALD B.H. (R-NY)
TSUAN VICTOR T.H.
TYSON JAMES L
UNITED STATES COUNCIL WORLD FREEDOM
WALT LEWIS W (GEN)

Anthony Bouscaren: Pioneer Fund to Prove how Blacks are Garbage.

http://pipl.com/directory/people/Anthony/Bouscaren<
/a>

 

 

 

Now how old was Obama when Ayers was into his radical thing?

8 YEARS OLD

Now how old was McCain when he was sitting on this board?

OLD ENOUGH TO KNOW BETTER

McCAIN IS DONE. EVEN REPUBLICANS HAVE WROTE HIM OFF. I'LL BE GLAD WHEN NOVEMBER IS HERE AND GONE.

OBAMA WAS NEVER MY CHOICE FOR PRESIDENT, BUT I'LL TAKE HIM ANY DAY OVER THIS SENILE DEMENTED BRAIN GONE.

AND HE CRIED HOW BUSH DID HIM BACK 8 YEARS AGO. WHAT A JOKE. AND IN NOVEMBER HE WILL BE A LOSER. AGAIN

AND HIS SIDE KICK WILL DISAPPEAR NEVER TO BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.

 

 

From her foreclosed home. 90 years old, I can't imagine. Sheriff arrived to remove her and she shot herself twice.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/03/eviction.suicide
.attempt/index.html

But today, what was a 3 page bill turned into a 450 page bill that includes helping Nascar Racetrack Owners, Puerto Rico & Virgin Island Rum Makers, Wool makers, Wooden Arrows for children, Alaskan Fishermen and on and on and on.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/house.bail
out/index.html?iref=mpstoryview#cnnSTCOther2

Not one F'N thing for people being thrown from their homes. This bill was like pouring a billion gallons of gas on an already inferno. What in the hell were both our Senate and House thinking. Both Democrats and Republicans? Also being supported by both of our Presidential Candidates.

What in Gods name does this particular $700 billion dollar bill have to do with banking? We just gave incentives for Arrow Makers and  Nascar, but a 90 woman nearly shoots herself to death being evicted.

What a sad small country we've become. We just gave $700 billion hard earned dollars by tax payers to bail out NO ONE.

U.S.A. has became worst than communistic Russia and China.

Building up Iraq when they hate us, but we drive our own people to suicide.

And what's even sadder, this money will not help a one damn thing or improve one single situation with peoples homes or health care. Nor Jobs or Economy.

Al Qaeda or the Taliban are not nearly our enemies as much as our Lawmakers. Right now WASHINGTON D.C. IS OUR BIGGEST ENEMY.

IF ONLY WE DIDN'T HAVE TO LOOK BACKWARDS, SARAH.

Sarah Palin's entire Debate summed up with that constant rant. There you go again Joe looking backwards instead of the future. Along with The Maverick, Maverick, Maverick................etc..............etc...........
..etc................

Let's Divert what our Republican President has done. Let's look away, Hell let's RUN AWAY from it. Understandably I'd run too. Did she succeed though? Not even.

It is the past eight years that now has come to roost for the next elected President to deal with. This Debate tonight even set the tone of Sarah Palin's persona further in stone than the others. After what the present Vice President has done with his power to completely destroy our ideals with his blow everybody and thing up mentality. Sarah Palin thinks the V.P. deserves even MORE POWER. Every single question that was asked of her tonight was Diverted to what she wanted to talk about.

Health Care..... I want to talk about Taxes

Bankruptcy..... I want to talk about Energy.

Excerpts of the entire Transcipt:

IFILL: Governor, please if you want to respond to what he said about Sen. McCain's comments about health care?

PALIN: I would like to respond about the tax increases.

 

IFILL: Governor, please if you want to respond to what he said about Sen. McCain's comments about health care?

PALIN: I would like to respond about the tax increases. We can speak in agreement here that darn right we need tax relief for Americans so that jobs can be created here. Now, Barack Obama and Sen. Biden also voted for the largest tax increases in U.S. history. Barack had 94 opportunities to side on the people's side and reduce taxes and 94 times he voted to increase taxes or not support a tax reduction, 94 times.

Now, that's not what we need to create jobs and really bolster and heat up our economy. We do need the private sector to be able to keep more of what we earn and produce. Government is going to have to learn to be more efficient and live with less if that's what it takes to reign in the government growth that we've seen today. But we do need tax relief and Barack Obama even supported increasing taxes as late as last year for those families making only $42,000 a year. That's a lot of middle income average American families to increase taxes on them. I think that is the way to kill jobs and to continue to harm our economy.

IFILL: Senator?

BIDEN: The charge is absolutely not true. Barack Obama did not vote to raise taxes. The vote she's referring to, John McCain voted the exact same way. It was a budget procedural vote. John McCain voted the same way. It did not raise taxes. Number two, using the standard that the governor uses, John McCain voted 477 times to raise taxes. It's a bogus standard it but if you notice, Gwen, the governor did not answer the question about deregulation, did not answer the question of defending John McCain about not going along with the deregulation, letting Wall Street run wild. He did support deregulation almost across the board. That's why we got into so much trouble.

IFILL: Would you like to have an opportunity to answer that before we move on?

PALIN: I'm still on the tax thing because I want to correct you on that again.

 

IFILL: So, Governor, as vice president, there's nothing that you have promised as a candidate that you would -- that you wouldn't take off the table because of this financial crisis we're in?

PALIN: There is not. And how long have I been at this, like five weeks?

That's about the size of it Sarah.

IFILL: Sen. Biden, you voted for this bankruptcy bill. Sen. Obama voted against it. Some people have said that mortgage- holders really paid the price.

BIDEN: Well, mortgage-holders didn't pay the price. Only 10 percent of the people who are -- have been affected by this whole switch from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 -- it gets complicated.

But the point of this -- Barack Obama saw the glass as half- empty. I saw it as half-full. We disagreed on that, and 85 senators voted one way, and 15 voted the other way.

But here's the deal. Barack Obama pointed out two years ago that there was a subprime mortgage crisis and wrote to the secretary of Treasury. And he said, "You'd better get on the stick here. You'd better look at it."

John McCain said as early as last December, quote -- I'm paraphrasing -- "I'm surprised about this subprime mortgage crisis," number one.

Number two, with regard to bankruptcy now, Gwen, what we should be doing now -- and Barack Obama and I support it -- we should be allowing bankruptcy courts to be able to re-adjust not just the interest rate you're paying on your mortgage to be able to stay in your home, but be able to adjust the principal that you owe, the principal that you owe.

That would keep people in their homes, actually help banks by keeping it from going under. But John McCain, as I understand it -- I'm not sure of this, but I believe John McCain and the governor don't support that.

There are ways to help people now. And there -- ways that we're offering are not being supported by -- by the Bush administration nor do I believe by John McCain and Gov. Palin.

IFILL: Gov. Palin, is that so?

PALIN: That is not so, but because that's just a quick answer, I want to talk about, again, my record on energy versus your ticket's energy ticket,

 

BUT THE SUBJECT WAS BANKRUPTCY GOVERNOR PALIN?

 

IFILL: You both have sons who are in Iraq or on their way to Iraq. You, Gov. Palin, have said that you would like to see a real clear plan for an exit strategy. What should that be, Governor?

Her NON-ANSWER

PALIN: I am very thankful that we do have a good plan and the surge and the counterinsurgency strategy in Iraq that has proven to work, I am thankful that that is part of the plan implemented under a great American hero, Gen. Petraeus, and pushed hard by another great American, Sen. John McCain.

I know that the other ticket opposed this surge, in fact, even opposed funding for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Barack Obama voted against funding troops there after promising that he would not do so.

PALIN: And Sen. Biden, I respected you when you called him out on that. You said that his vote was political and you said it would cost lives. And Barack Obama at first said he would not do that. He turned around under political pressure and he voted against funding the troops. We do have a plan for withdrawal. We don't need early withdrawal out of Iraq. We cannot afford to lose there or we're going to be no better off in the war in Afghanistan either. We have got to win in Iraq.

And with the surge that has worked we're now down to pre-surge numbers in Iraq. That's where we can be. We can start putting more troops in Afghanistan as we also work with our NATO allies who are there strengthening us and we need to grow our military. We cannot afford to lose against al Qaeda and the Shia extremists who are still there, still fighting us, but we're getting closer and closer to victory. And it would be a travesty if we quit now in Iraq.

IFILL: Senator?

BIDEN: Gwen, with all due respect, I didn't hear a plan. Barack Obama offered a clear plan. Shift responsibility to Iraqis over the next 16 months. Draw down our combat troops. Ironically the same plan that Maliki, the prime minister of Iraq and George Bush are now negotiating. The only odd man out here, only one left out is John McCain, number one. Number two, with regard to Barack Obama not quote funding the troops, John McCain voted the exact same way. John McCain voted against funding the troops because of an amendment he voted against had a timeline in it to draw down American troops. And John said I'm not going to fund the troops if in fact there's a time line. Barack Obama and I agree fully and completely on one thing. You've got to have a time line to draw down the troops and shift responsibility to the Iraqis.

We're spending $10 billion a month while Iraqis have an $80 billion surplus. Barack says it's time for them to spend their own money and have the 400,000 military we trained for them begin to take their own responsibility and gradually over 16 months, withdrawal. John McCain -- this is a fundamental difference between us, we'll end this war. For John McCain, there's no end in sight to end this war, fundamental difference. We will end this war.

She didn't give an answer on McCain's plan so she offered:

IFILL: Governor?

PALIN: Your plan is a white flag of surrender in Iraq and that is not what our troops need to hear today, that's for sure. And it's not what our nation needs to be able to count on. You guys opposed the surge. The surge worked. Barack Obama still can't admit the surge works.

She still didn't offer a Comment on a Plan.

Entire Transcript of the Debate:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/02/debate.transcri
pt/

 

All Sarah Palin did was SURVIVE this Debate. But still no substance. And winking at the camera and smiling like look at me here, almost enforced Tina Fey's portait of Palin on so many levels, it made her look like even more the fool. More Tutored and Poised, but from the get go her response to Gwen Ifill was like a defiant adolescent determined to avoid any real answers to anything. "  And I may not answer the questions that either the moderator or you want to hear "

HOW ABOUT JUST GIVING US A STRAIGHT ANSWER TO JUST ONE QUESTION?

Just because you hang on until the end of the bout, doesn't mean you won anything. It's called you avoided the knockout punch. The Darn It, Heck of,

Commenting 20 times, 'Say it ain't so, Joe, there you go again pointing backwards again. You preferenced your whole comment with the Bush administration. Now doggone it, let's look ahead and tell Americans what we have to plan to do for them in the future.'

Just didn't impress upon many that you could run the country if needed. This naive kid just can't comprehend that what has taking place in the last eight years will have shaped this country for years and years to come. And to try again and again just to blow it off like the past years and events wont matter shows how inexperienced this woman really is.

Bush's past will be our nightmare for a very lengthy time to come. And what JOE was conveying but Palin was trying so hard to divert was that McCain will be the SAME as the last eight years. But what is more frightening, is that Palin seems more in sync with both Bush & Cheney then McCain. And that my fellow citizens is a brew for more impending disaster.

Palin walked on the stage, didn't fall down and survived. But in the end showed she still couldn't answer one question asked of her. Instead again choosing to Divert to the subjects she felt more comfortable with, no matter how out of context they were.

And if Sarah Palin can't deal with the past and how because of that past, we now have at present a complete total disaster on our hands. How in the hell will she be able to offer any solution to it when she keeps trying to hide from it like it never existed. The past in reality is NOW.

IF ONLY WE DIDN'T HAVE TO LOOK BACKWARDS, BECAUSE BACKWARDS IS STILL WHERE WE ARE. THE DAY SHE UNDERSTANDS THIS, IS THE DAY SHE WILL BE ABLE TO GAIN SOME SORT OF CONTROL OF THE SITUATION AND OFFER THOSE ANSWERS. BUT UNTIL THEN,

NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF DENIAL.

 

 

 

BUT SHE DID REINFORCE ONE STATEMENT TO US ALL,

NEVER AGAIN.

OH YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT SARAH, WHICH COUNTS YOUR TICKET OUT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      About the size of it.

 

 

 

 

Funny how the thought of losing everything does that.

Well Welcome to OUR CONSTANT WORLD Mr. & Mrs. Conservative.

Absolutely Unbelievable. Are you really hearing the Idiocy from this woman?

Watch Palin and Hear her as she speaks again on why she thinks she has Foreign Policy Experience.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRpmC9GXa-I&feature=
related

 

Well we have this narrow way with these two countries on both sides.

But tell me why this enhances your Foreign Policy Credentials?

Well it certainly does, because our next door neighbors are Foreign Countries.

Are you getting all this?

Jesus Almighty, have we ever in History had someone so dumb trying so desperately but failing so miserably to convince us that they are in fact not Dumb? Sarah, do Mr. Magoo a favor and SHUT UP. Because like Magoo, McCain needs his eyes checked along with HIS BRAIN.

Entire interview.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6c1oL5V_4U&feature=
related Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQRGsZ0SN7E&feature=
related Part 2

 

Or Maybe those witches with their witchcraft got to her after all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAWM7E_WMfo<
/p>

(She steps in at the 5:00 minute point. )

 

Now, I went to a Pentecostal Church for awhile. And the Pastor wasn't from Kenya, but an American born Black. And his views on WITCHCRAFT?

 

NOBODY CAN HOO DOO YOU BUT YOU!

 

People who really worship and put their selves in the hands of Jesus. Do not believe that people can bring on doom in their lives. Why? Because they are covered in the Blood of Jesus. They fear God, not Satan.

Only HYPOCRITES claiming to be real Christians, would have to have somebody lay hands on them to protect them from HOO DOO.

Pastors preach that Jesus will have your back at all times. I'm no religious fanatic that's for sure, in fact anything but. But I will tell you my favorite verse in the Bible ( And no, I've never even gotten remotely close to reading the whole bible ).

NKJV

Isaiah 54:17

No weapon that is formed against you shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against you in judgment you shall condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, said the LORD.

 

 NOW, DOES SHE BELIEVE IN THE POWER OF JESUS OR SATAN?

YES, YOU TELL US ALL ABOUT IT. PLEASE

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/24/us/politics/w24
davis.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hp

WASHINGTON — One of the giant mortgage companies at the heart of the credit crisis paid $15,000 a month from the end of 2005 through last month to a firm owned by Senator John McCain’s campaign manager, according to two people with direct knowledge of the arrangement.

The disclosure undercuts a statement by Mr. McCain on Sunday night that the campaign manager, Rick Davis, had had no involvement with the company for the last several years.

$30,000 to $35,000 a month to $15,000 a month recently.

Well that explains it, with the Payola reduced. It's like he's really not still involved. OKEY DOKEY

At least two other people associated with Mr. McCain have ties to either Freddie Mac. The lobbying firm of the Republican that Mr. McCain has enlisted to plan his transition to the White House should he be elected, William Timmons Sr., earned nearly $3 million from Freddie Mac between 2000 and its seizure, federal lobbying records show. Mr. Timmons is founder of Timmons & Co., one of Washington’s best-known lobbying shops. The payments were first reported by Bloomberg News.

Mark Buse, Mr. McCain’s chief of staff for his Senate office, also is a Freddie Mac alumnus. He and his former lobbying employer, ML Strategies, registered to lobby for the company in July 2003, and received $460,000 before the association ended after 2004.

OH BUT WAIT!

Mr. McCain and his advisers have argued that whatever connections Mr. Davis and other McCain campaign officials have had to the mortgage giants, Mr. McCain in the Senate has been an advocate for reforming them. And they have suggested that Mr. Obama is linked to the companies through donations from their employees ties to former officials there, including James Johnson, another former chief executive of Fannie Mae who was the head of Mr. Obama’s vice presidential search team until stepping aside after coming under criticism for getting a mortgage on favorable terms.

But....But......But........Still....... OBAMA.

Entire article in above link. McCain: Bad Bad N.Y. Times

They are BIASED!

AND McCAIN IS A LIAR. AS USUAL.

AGAIN, KEATING FIVE- S & L SCANDAL. Ring -a- Ding Ding!

Everybody's hands are dirty here. Only McCain's hands have been in the cookie jar longer. 1982

 

 

Enough Said.

 

In no way shape, manner or form am i saying that people who bought homes way over their heads should get any easy way out. But since our government is so inclined to bail out the financial institutions that mislead a good portion of those people, by giving them the mortgages they weren't in reality even entitled to. WHY NOT BAIL THEM OUT TOO?

To Hell with it. All those who have been foreclosed on and soon facing eviction coming at them. Well let them stay where they're at, and consider their houses PAID FOR. Because in essence, isn't that what the Government basically has decided to do for WALL STREET?

And all of the people who have lost their homes were not through bad mortgages, but people who lost their jobs or through serious illness couldn't any longer work. Don't they deserve the same courtesy from situations that were completely not of their own doings, unlike the Rich Institutions that knew exactly what they were doing?

LET'S BAIL OUT ALL. NOT JUST THE RICH WELCHERS THAT GAMBLED AND LOST. 

And who will pay for this in excess of a Trillion Dollars to Bail Out these BANKERS?

ALL OF THE TAX PAYERS THAT'S WHO . So shouldn't we get a a vote of which people we should BAIL OUT? That's called a Democracy.

MY VOTE GOES TO THE LITTLE GUY.

The way Bush is conducting this, it's called COMMUNISTIC.

And I say that's BULL.

 

April, 1987--Edwin Gray ends his term as chairman of Federal Home Loan Bank Board in June. Before his departure, he is summoned to the office of Sen. Dennis DeConcini. DeConcini, with four other Senators (John McCain, Alan Cranston, John Glenn, and Donald Riegle) question Gray about the appropriateness of Bank Board investigations into Charles Keating's Lincoln Savings and Loan. All five senators, who have received campaign contributions from Keating, would become known as the "Keating Five". The subsequent Lincoln failure is estimated to have cost the taxpayers over $2 billion.

http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/s&l/

McCain was one of the "Keating Five," congressmen investigated on ethics charges for strenuously helping convicted racketeer Charles Keating after he gave them large campaign contributions and vacation trips.

Charles Keating was convicted of racketeering and fraud in both state and federal court after his Lincoln Savings & Loan collapsed, costing the taxpayers $3.4 billion. His convictions were overturned on technicalities; for example, the federal conviction was overturned because jurors had heard about his state conviction, and his state charges because Judge Lance Ito (yes, that judge) screwed up jury instructions. Neither court cleared him, and he faces new trials in both courts.)

Though he was not convicted of anything, McCain intervened on behalf of Charles Keating after Keating gave McCain at least $112,00 in contributions. In the mid-1980s, McCain made at least 9 trips on Keating's airplanes, and 3 of those were to Keating's luxurious retreat in the Bahamas. McCain's wife and father-in-law also were the largest investors (at $350,000) in a Keating shopping center; the Phoenix New Times called it a "sweetheart deal."

"The corrupting influence" of money in politics?

What McCain says his party is against? REALLY?

He RANTS on all the wealthy special interests, and their ability to buy off Elected Officials.

WELL HE SHOULD KNOW!

Now again I can't keep up with his ever changing mind, sometimes with-in minutes. He's for Regulations? He's NOT for Regulations? Which is it Senator?

 

http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/s&l/slbib1.html

 

Now McCain wants a 9-11 type of Investigation into what happened, with the Present Day Financial Crash.

COME ON SENATOR, WHO ARE YOU KIDDING?

John McCain knows all to well how things got so fouled up. It's called,

GREED! OUR REAL TERRORISM.

He was very well paid during the S&L scandal. Just like these financial Institutions and their backers were, trying to ROB the very people they doled out mortages to. When all along they knew damn well those people could never pay for them.

NOW WHO IS SUFFERING?

EVERYONE THAT'S WHO. Even home owners that have paid their bills. Because of these money welching misfits, ALL houses have now dropped to a new low value. Honest homeowners equity lines are now being AXED. It's not all about how the PEOPLE went and bought homes over their heads, when these Financial Institutions knew all too well they couldn't afford them.

Who's more at fault? WALL STREET BRAINS WITH ALL OF THEIR DEGREES, OR THE PEOPLE GETTING THE TEMPORARY FREE PASSES?

HOW MANY FREE PASSES ARE ALSO BEING HANDED OUT TO McCAIN? NOT MUCH ON THIS SUBJECT IS BEING DISCUSSED.

AND WHY NOT? IT DOESN'T GET ANY MORE RELEVANT THAN THIS.

Investigation? Who is kidding who. All McCain got was a slap on the wrist for his involvement of the S&L scandal.

SO SPARE US ALL THE DRAMA.

AS WALL STREET CRASHES McCAIN GIVES THIS SPEECH.

Fundamentals of Economy Still Strong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4KY39jLdu4&feature
=user

At a morning rally in Florida. Are you kidding me?

After the events in the last 24 hours, this Demented man actually goes and gives a speech still saying the Fundamentals of Economy Strong. Two of the oldest and largest financial institutions crash and McCain is still living in La La Land.

Is this who you really want to be our President? Somebody who doesn't even live in REALITY. My God we have been there done that FOR EIGHT YEARS.

Later at a different afternoon rally he changed those words to,  describing the country's current financial situation as "a crisis" and repeatedly said he was concerned about the fundamentals of the economy. HUH?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVcEvJNoEiA<
/p>

This man is just not all there. Nobody has to make John Mccain out to be an aging losing his mind brain degenerate. He does that all on his own.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/
15/mccain_fundamentals_of_economy.html?hpid=topnews

 

The media doesn't twist anything about this man, they quote him accurately and there is Video and Audio to back them up. McCain's own words do him in. What has to happen before both McCain and his Nemesis Bush, realize the reality of what is happening here in this Country?

Listen to Bush Today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liLBbIvlRH0

Is there a difference between these two speeches? Bush & McCain. They both still believe we are doing just fine and dandy. Nothing we can't handle.

Even events of this magnitude. BOTH THINK ECONOMY IS STILL STRONG.

Heads in the sand? How about so far up their a**es, they can't see through their own s**t.

Now let's talk TERRORISM.

It's called GREED. The Rich in this country TERRORIZE the not rich every single day here. That is our real enemy. And this REALITY affects everyone. Financial wizards wanted to get RICHER. So they handed mortgages to people they KNEW couldn't pay for them. Causing ALL home values to plummet into the depths. So other peoples homes are now not worth much either. Other people that didn't engage in these doings.

ALL now will suffer. Home equity lines are being AXED. On good and honest home owners, who do pay their bills.

But hey everyone not to worry, outing President still says everything is Hunky dory. And now another one who wants to replace him in same deranged brain mode. CHRIST, WHO WILL EVER LEARN?

Un-Friggin- Believable.

YEAH, YEAH, YEAH..... WE WANT MORE OF THE SAME!

Yes, Obama isn't experienced. Biden is. But at least Obama is living in reality. McCain is living in a cloud. One second he rants ECONOMY IS STRONG, next second his says ECONOMY IS IN CRISIS AND HE'S CONCERNED?

Who is this Man? Do you really know? Do you even really care?

John Kerry was RIGHT. Before McCain debates Obama, He had better finish debating himself.

His Mind is gone, gone, gone.

At least with Obama, Biden will be there to fill in where he lacks experience. But with McCain/Palin, it will be the BLIND LEADING THE BLIND.

AND YOU KNOW IT.

 

 

 

 

 

MY GOSH YOU CAN SEE IT FROM............

 

BATMAN'S NEW JOKERS. OR SHOULD I SAY...

 

    

   McCain                                                Palin

 

YEP! IT'S A LOONEY TOONS CAMPAIGN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7CclVneVpw>

 

 

 

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=
5778018&page=1

FORT WAINWRIGHT, Alaska - John McCain running mate Sarah Palin sought Thursday to defend her qualifications but struggled with foreign policy, unable to describe President Bush's doctrine of pre-emptive strikes against threatening nations and acknowledging she's never met a foreign head of state.

The Republican vice presidential nominee told Charles Gibson of ABC News in her first televised interview since being named to the GOP ticket that "I'm ready" to be president if called upon. However, she sidestepped on whether she had the national security credentials needed to be commander in chief.

Palin, 44, has been Alaska's governor for less than two years and before that was a small-town mayor. She was McCain's surprise selection for the No. 2 slot on the ticket, raising questions about her readiness to serve in the White House, particularly during wartime.

McCain has defended her qualifications, citing her command of the Alaska National Guard and Alaska's proximity to Russia.

Asked whether those were sufficient credentials, Palin said: "It is about reform of government and it's about putting government back on the side of the people, and that has much to do with foreign policy and national security issues." She said she brings expertise in making the country energy independent as a former chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.

She acknowledged that national security encompasses more than energy but said: "I want you to not lose sight of the fact that energy is a foundation of national security."

Palin said other than a trip to visit soldiers in Kuwait and Germany last year — "a trip of a lifetime" that "changed my life" — her only other foreign travel was to Mexico and Canada. She also said she had never met a head of state and added: "If you go back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents, they may have the same answer that I just gave you."

Pressed about what insights into recent Russian actions she gained by living in Alaska, Palin answered: "They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska."

Foreign policy questions dominated the first of three interviews Palin was giving Gibson over two days.

In the interview Thursday, Palin:

_Appeared unsure of the Bush doctrine — essentially that the United States must help spread democracy to stop terrorism and that the nation will act pre-emptively to stop potential foes.

Asked whether she agreed with that, Palin said: "In what respect, Charlie?" Gibson pressed her for an interpretation of it. She said: "His world view." That prompted Gibson to say "no, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war" and describe it to her.

Rest of article.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_el_pr/pal
in_interview

 

 

UNBELIEVEBLE.

Palin said other than a trip to visit soldiers in Kuwait and Germany last year — "a trip of a lifetime" that "changed my life" —

She sounds like a little kid.

Want to get entire UN-edited Transcript of this entire interview.

TV side is edited.  I know, I know you mean she could sound even more dumbfounded?

YEP!

Joe Biden against this? I CANNOT WAIT.

No wonder Grandpa doesn't want to let her out of his sight.

Every Republican & Conservative blog sight I visited this a.m. Was embarrassment and anger, that McCain had chosen this naive KID.

Stay Tuned for the rest of this interview.

JOE BIDEN: 36 year Senator with a POWER HOUSE of Experience on Foreign Policy. HE HAS MET MANY, MANY, MANY........................ FOREIGN HEADS OF STATE.

SARAH PALIN: NONE

But she did go and visit the troops and say " IT WAS A TRIP OF A LIFETIME ".

What was the line in Dirty Dancing?

GO BACK TO YOUR PLAY PEN, " BABY "!

 

Like I said in Who's Babysitting Who?

BAIT!  NOTHING MORE.

And not many fish biting at it, but the STUPID.

 

 

OBAMA/BIDEN or DING DONG/DING-A-LING.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHY NOT?

McCain used the same damn phrase last October in Iowa. About Hillary Clinton's health care plan. And on three other occasions.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=WMPYkNQlJMM

And again in May after claiming the Republican Nomination.

But now McCain has the audacity to start yelling & crying,

 

 

Obama's same identical remark is A DISGRACE!

http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou080910_
tnt_obama_palin_lipstick_pig.60eceb6b.html

 

 

 

Well here is Obama's ENTIRE soundbite in it's actual context. Is he referring to Palin? Or was he talking about McCAIN so-called AGENDA of nothings.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qv4OCIMl8Io

 

 

 

I am completely fed up with this stinking Cheer Leader, who everybody thinks should be off limits. Then a remark gets made that  didn't even have one damn thing to do with her, and out comes screaming GRANDPA. She and McCain haven't left each others sides since he picked her. What the hell is she, A LITTLE BABY?

LET'S DIVERT TO INNUENDO'S INSTEAD OF DEBATING THE ISSUES.

 

McCain is Desperate and grasping at straws at anything and everything. Now even more facts came out today on Palin when a judge warned Palin and her family 3 years ago even before she became Governor to stop badgering her ex brother in-law.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/158140?from=rss?nav=sla
te

 

 

TIME FOR THE BABY TO GO OUT ON HER OWN.

TIME FOR THE OLD MAN TO GO OUT ON HIS OWN.

TIME TO LOOSE THE SECURITY BLANKETS, EACH OTHER.

TIME.

 

During her speech at the Republican National Convention last week, Palin cast herself as a crusader for fiscal rectitude as Alaska's governor. She noted that she sold a state-owned plane used by the former governor. "While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the governor's office that I didn't believe our citizens should have to pay for," she said to loud applause.

 

Palin Billed State for Nights Spent at Home

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti
cle/2008/09/08/AR2008090803088.html?hpid=topnews<
/p>

 

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has billed taxpayers for 312 nights spent in her own home during her first 19 months in office, charging a "per diem" allowance intended to cover meals and incidental expenses while traveling on state business.

The governor also has charged the state for travel expenses to take her children on official out-of-town missions. And her husband, Todd, has billed the state for expenses and a daily allowance for trips he makes on official business for his wife.

Palin, who earns $125,000 a year, claimed and received $16,951 as her allowance, which officials say was permitted because her official "duty station" is Juneau, according to an analysis of her travel documents by The Washington Post.

The governor's daughters and husband charged the state $43,490 to travel, and many of the trips were between their house in Wasilla and Juneau, the capital city 600 miles away, the documents show.

Gubernatorial spokeswoman Sharon Leighow said Monday that Palin's expenses are not unusual and that, under state policy, the first family could have claimed per diem expenses for each child taken on official business but has not done so.

Article in it's entirety in above link.

 

REALLY? NOT UNUSUAL?

 

Well maybe for someone who has actually TRAVELED?

But to have being PAID WHILE HOME? I'd say not just unusual, but how about EMBEZZLED!