MyFox
 

Blindone's Blog

by Blindone from SE Michigan

Last Post 15 days, 5 hours Ago


 To   Keiser26100's  &  boe57's Blog

 

You’re both a couple putz! Keiser, How dare you attack “The White Collar Workers”  with your lame challenge of working long hours in the same environment that you do.  It goes both ways fool! I’ve worked both sides of that fence and each has its own hardships. Your argument that white collar workers couldn’t hack it in your shoes has no bearing on the issue that you are trying to point out. Your being a “blue collar” worker does not make you any better than anyone else; the same go for the office folks. We each have different skill sets, and truth be known a lot of white collar workers got their start on the floor; thus making your point even less effective.

As for you argument about the management being responsible for all of your woes; you obviously got a limited understanding of the economics of the situation. For years both the union and management were in “bed” with each other; allowing the “status quo” to become  what it currently stands.

 

Truth is most autoworkers are over paid for what they are doing. The cost of doing business is dictating (to management) where their operating costs should be. THAT is what management is basing their figures on; not necessarily how much the CEO is being paid.

Both you and boe57 feel that it would be far better for the white collar workers to take the cut in pay instead of you poor abused factory rats. Wake up and smell the coffee sons….Who do you think has been taking the brunt of the pay cuts for the past 25 years?!? I can guarantee that it hasn’t been the factory folks! The factory folks still get a cost of living adjustment – quarterly! Up until recently you did not have to a co-pay for your medical expenses, you get a bonus when you sign the contract (agreement), you get (or used to) cash vouchers to use at the company store toward the purchase of work clothes. PLUS you get paid for all of the overtime that you work; a lot of salaried folks do not. (Unless you work on the floor)

And what REALLY makes me mad is your reference to management people as being terrorists. You dope smoking, beer swilling crack head! Get your head outta your rearend and take a breath. They aren’t ruining the country, yes there are greedy folks out there that are; but they are your management people, that is a fact. The real dirty ones are those cooking the financial books: the financial folks. Banks and lending institutions are the big players in that realm.

You complain about the statement made by the CEO; saying that if you don’t come back to the table with your tail between your legs and pony up to the offer, he’ll pack up his company and move to greener pastures. Just how did you expect him to respond to your situation?

 

To: Longshot………..

 

Ok, someone had a little too much Johnny Walker for breakfast this morning…………..

“My friend” (and I use that term loosely) you really need to get a grip. First of all your display of mental thought patterns went out with the dinosaurs. This is NOT and issue of “Us against Them”, it’s an issue on a couple fronts. One being an economic front, AA says that it cannot continue to operate at a level that exceeds its competition  (wages) and expect to turn a profit. The union fights back saying that they can’t afford a 55% pay cut; an understandable argument.

This is where AA screwed up, they took their plan of attack from the example that GM and others used. But instead of following it to the letter, they twisted it into an insane idea. And no wonder people are ticked off; GM’s contract uses a lower pay scale for new hires, everyone else is status quo.

The second problem here is with the historical data; the hourly folks (formerly GM) are paid way too much: a situation that both the union and management agreed to. They created this pay monster and now they have to figure out a way to live with it in today’s market. Only problem is, is the fact that the union officials as well as the rank and file won’t stand for any kind of pay cut. However that exactly what needs to happen; although not to the extreme that the management at AA claims it needs. I think that unlike my “friend” here claims, there is a happy medium that could be struck by both sides, and they just need to find it.

 

Longshot, you have your transmission stuck in reverse and need to come back to reality.

 

This is not the 60’s and management is not out there to stick it to the rank and file. Your rant stinks of bias and venom against “the establishment”.  In light of the current economy and the competition between companies today, sacrifices need to be made by both sides. It is not all one sided as you claim.

What’s wrong with AA calling back the laid off workers? They are just trying to keep the flow of goods and services running to their customers. Now admittedly I do not understand the logic of this attempt because I do not understand how AA could do this-those workers on layoff are still union workers, do they really think that they would cross the picket lines? I don’t. I also do not understand how AA could threaten those same workers with termination if they don’t come back….. Why not terminate the striking workers first? Then they could offer those vacant positions to the laid off workers: IF then the laid off folks refuse to comply: terminate them as well.

Enough of this nonsense; here’s the bottom line kids……………..and yes I’m talking to all of you narrow minded knuckle draggers (geez and I thought that I was the only one) IF some kind of agreement IS NOT reached, all of your ranting and screaming “OFF WITH THEIR HEADS” will be just that: hot air. AA will close its doors, shut off it lights, and go somewhere else with their business. And all of you knuckle dragging union boys will have two choices, (1) go ask your Union Representatives for jobs, (yeah right) , and (2) unemployment. That’s it no more no less.

So go ahead and make all of those damn near communistic comments and damn the torpedoes speeches, but in the end it’s all about how badly you want to keep your jobs. Period.

Prove me wrong. Look at history my proof is written there. If I need to spell it out for you, just look no further than the former GM truck plant at Willowrun.

14 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 14
Page 1 of 1
MichiganPerson read my blog
Apr 1, 2008 | 1:37 PM

the problem I see here and with the car company's is that they want to make the worker's take a pay cut benefits cut because they say that is why everything cost so much Right?? then why the hell when these people take the cuts the price's of what ever goes higher??instead of going down or staying the same.

MichiganPerson read my blog
Apr 1, 2008 | 1:45 PM

I know the company has to make money but just how much do they want??these workers could come back like the Chinese and work for penny's on the dollar and the price of what ever they are making and selling will still go up and up and up.the people that have to buy the product is the one's that get's screwed

Blindone read my blog view my photos
Apr 1, 2008 | 2:57 PM

You are absolutely correct! However, in order for your idea to work everyone/all manufacturers must do likewise, or else nothing changes! That's why you have the situation that you do. AA has to buy the goods and services that they need to manufacture their products from other suppliers; who in turn keep raising the costs as well. It's a visious circle.

shockhazard read my blog view my photos
Apr 1, 2008 | 3:29 PM

Companies have to realise the give and take relationship about jobs , and buying products . If there are no jobs people can't buy the product . I hope the Chinese will be able to buy axels .

Ratt_Killer read my blog view my photos
Apr 1, 2008 | 4:14 PM

Good post Blindone. Makes sense. The hardcore closeminded union members only see the lining of their wallet and have no economic common sense.
Ratt

jax276 read my blog view my photos
Apr 1, 2008 | 4:49 PM

At last a post on this subject with some real insight. I don't agree with everything but I'm not suppose to. Good post

MichiganPerson read my blog
Apr 1, 2008 | 5:06 PM

Shock what would the Chinese need axels for dont they walk everywhere??I'm not sure they have those little ric carts where the one guys pulling it and you are in the buggy..

boutit read my blog
Apr 1, 2008 | 6:16 PM

You have very valid points,but I must comment on the behalf of the people who take pride in their jobs whether it be hrly or salary! We're in the same sinking boat! If this company can threaten us as AMERICANS while carrying the
American name,where are the morals?? It's not what you do,it's how you do it! There seems to be no respect for the TEAM that made this company Global.We couldn't have done it without each other and that's where the respect comes in!!Sometimes we need to stop and start over with respect for each other because if anyone of us loose we all loose. Just think what type of respect this company has for it's salary workers who have no Union to back them up.

SEEDUB read my blog view my photos
Apr 1, 2008 | 6:51 PM

Great post!

Alexinhowell read my blog
Apr 2, 2008 | 9:21 AM

Well, I've never been in a union and have only recently been reading up on how they work. I agree there needs to be a happy medium, but from what I see, the white collar is way overpaid. Can you explain to me why they get million dollar bonus when the company is looking for budget cuts? With the rise in cost of things, keeping the blue collar pay rates the same seems to be a big pay cut for them. However cutting out a million dollar bonus.....Is that really going to hurt a millionaire? Also, I think the free trade act was meant to help companys go global, not move out totally. If all companys follow suit, who's going to buy the product? Are there enough white collar workers to keep the company going by being the customer as well? Isn't this spitting in americas face? The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Sounds like slavery to me. If you put in an honest days work, you should be able to reap some benefits from it without sharing your house bills with 10 family members!

Blindone read my blog view my photos
Apr 2, 2008 | 4:01 PM

Wow, thank you to everyone!
For what it's worth, I do hope that an agreement can be reached, and the workers can go back to work and soon.

shockhazard read my blog view my photos
Apr 2, 2008 | 5:51 PM

Michigan person , maby the Chinese can use those axles on their rick-shaws ?

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Apr 7, 2008 | 9:21 PM

Do you suppose that all the anti-freedom in trade talk is the result of racism against Chinese and Indian people or just plain old xenophobia (fear of foreigners)?

The arguments sure are not economics. Other than racism and xenophobia I cannot see very many reasons to deny freedom and competition. If the union workers provide better products, then why would they need the power of coercion? If corporations do better without unions, then why would they need laws banning union practices? Why does government need to be involved at all for either side?

The only plausible reasons for government intervention are racism, xenophobia, or a reason along the lines of despotism, tyranny, or some other sort of anti-freedom impulse or need to control and dominate others.

If those dirty, slant-eyed Chinese are so mindless and incapable of doing the same job as you then what do you have to worry about if they are allowed to compete against you? Just for the sake of fairness though, if two people are willing and able to do the same job, shouldn't the person willing to do the job for less get the job? Don't they deserve the job more than a member of the elite? Why do the nobility in the unions (who often get into the union because of family ties) get a job over somebody willing to accept a more competitive wage? Why should I have to hire a repairman for my refrigerator or a plumber to fix my toilet at a higher price just because they are part of the noble class, the union class? What about the rest of us surfs who are not part of the elite union class, why do we get di

Michigan_Man read my blog view my photos
Apr 7, 2008 | 9:22 PM

why do we get discriminated against just because we are not part of the monopoly?

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Blindone

Born in Flint, and raised here in the Midwest. I'm the son of a WW II veteran and darn proud of it. I believe in the National Anthem and am proud to be an American. I don’t like the way things are going so I’ll tell you about my opinion on various topics. Been working for the automotive industry for 30 years and I'm proud of that, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t have ideas about that as well. I’ll occasionally throw out some comments there too! If you don’t like my comments, you have too options (1) don’t read ‘em, and (2) leave a comments of your own: BUT don’t expect me to apologize for anything (other than mistakes). These are my view points and I call them as I see them: based on the values that I grew up with: not yours. I love being outside, drag racing working on cars (with my kids), fishing, camping that kind of stuff. If need be I can be reached @ DGESmoknz28@aol.com

Member Since: 4/25/2007