BigGent's Blog

At least Senator Obama tries to stick to relevant facts instead of trying to whip up an National Hysteria....relevant facts my aching butt....he's diverting from his shady associations...HE HAS TO.

But wait...Conservatism doesn't work any better than communism....and there in lies the truth....you're a communist. Boy are we in trouble.

Pipper......did you even read the post?

When are you Republicans going to understand Conservatism doesn't work any better than Communism.

What in the heck does this mean???? yeah...I know...we 'cling' to our religion and guns!

Hello Pipper.

Thank you for your kind Invitation. I see the wisdom in your words & I feel the same as you & I understand the likelihood of changing anyone's mind here. But the fact is I feel this is where I'm needed most. It severs no purpose to speak where we're all in agreement. But here... where Fear & Hostility seem to rule, as we get closer to Election day... is where I'm needed. Because if no one speaks out against the Rumors,Propaganda & Outright lies.... They can grow, Take on a life of their own... & sometimes, even be taken as truth. perhaps I can't stop this, or even slow it down. But if by chance, I can get through to just a few people & get them to listen to reason & give up the Fear & Hysteria that they're breading in each other... Then perhaps, just perhaps I'll have been useful.

Once you take away the Fear, Hysteria & Propaganda... You get to the Truth... Then we can work from there.

Now Mrs Kwam.. My Comment had nothing to do with Religion or Guns. It was a statement of fact. Allow me to explain. In my life time with the exception of Richard Nixon each time a Republican was in office it resulted in war - Increases in unemployment - Inflation - Recession or all of the above. The Conservative Economic Theory's of Reganomics, 1000 points of light & Trickle down theory Simply DO NOT WORK!!

A Conservative Business man once asked me " How can you increase jobs & Grow business's by razing taxes on them"? Well I let that question go because I didn't think he was serious. But I've come to realize he was. It's a simple question with a simple

Big Gent, Oh, my. First, let me say, you write well. I noticed your reply to pipper or ripper or whoever he/she is and it sounded good on the surface. But,then, when I read your responses, it is as if you cannot restrain from hate speech. As far as the war issue, check your history. Yes, President Bush, a republican, was in office for this last round of wars. If you check your history, a Democrat has been in office for the majority of wars our country has entered and fought. If you need, I can itemize them for you. You also need to wake up to another fact. When you talk about Democrats/Republicans, you seem to be in the dark about the fact that there are a few, very wealthy, making way way more than a few hundred thousand a year, people in charge of these political parties. When I read what you write I am amazed by the fact you have bought into a party's rhetoric. I would say the same if you were supporting the Republican party. The last two days, I have given you attention. I have offered you only truths about what Senator Obama has, himself or his spokes person, said, stated and posted on his web site. You, in turn, even though very well, have thrown out political talking points, rhetoric, hate incentive words, and divisional useless comments. I think you believe in what you are doing and truly have bought into party rhetoric used to control and brain wash enough people to get elected. So, I guess, sorry, but I will have to move on to someone else. You may be capable of communicating on a higher level where facts, records, actions, words, promises, made b

there you go, Obama can't talk for himself.

Obama's campaign does not bring up a lot of stuff because there is not any stuff. They
have accused McCain of an affair with a lobbyist,when that was proven unfounded, they dropped it. They and you talk about the Keating 5, an issue that McCain was investigated completely about and was found not guilty of anything. The difference is, you, as an Obama supporter, Obama himself,and his spokes people from his campaign try to compare that with Ayers, (Obama was not 3 but already a college graduate) and his working relationship with him in Chicago, Wright (his radical, hate filled spewing preacher) and his participating, possible tithing to support, and political connection through contributions for approx. 20 years (not at 3 years old but 24 to 44 years old), Resco, (the crook facing jail time) Obama knew, associated with, took money to buy his house from, and received political contributions, etc (Oh, yeah, Obama was a little older than 3 at the time) and, yes, ACORN, an organization he has funded, trained and represented in court for years (oh no, he was not 3 then either) as an adult. Again, Big Gent, you lack any level of ability to employ rational, logical thinking. As well as you write, if you could include rational, logical thinking, you might actually be able to encourage someone to vote for your man.

Big Gent.
Is it just me or do you just respond
to emotional posts and not to any
post that consists of facts, not rhetoric, talking points or downright fiction?
I wonder why that is.
Could it be you have been inspired by Senator Obama and can only respond as he does when it comes to truth and fact?
At least you are not saying you want to follow his lead and then go about talking about fact and truth.
You give Senator Obama more respect than he does President Kennedy.

Lynn

But while listening to the interview a funny thing Occurred to me. Perhaps I'm a little naive, but what difference does it make how many voters were registered they could still only vote one time. For example let's say the name.... Mary Poppins was registered 1000 or even 100,000 times. Couldn't that person only vote once? of let's say there were that many fake id's to go with the name. The impact on the election would be minimal at best. Yes I'm taking into account the Florida thing. But the odds of that would be astronomical. So I can say with reasonable confidence that this was a money thing rather than an election thing.

I don't deny being partisan in fact I mentioned it in more than one post. But for the record, I have voted Republican & even Independent more than once. I'm always open to new ideas & don't necessarily limit myself to one party. It's just in this election, I truly believe that Senator Barack Obama is the better man to lead this Country.

As for Senator McCain sure there is a lot of things The Obama campaign could bring up but chose not to. Like his Military Record (crashing planes, alleged Gloating over collateral bomb damage his affair with his now wife etc.) But no one is officially saying these things, for to do so would be to diminish all the good & accomplishments that make up the man called John McCain. (*please note that all people that I respect in my posts have Capitals in their names, his has always had them)

I was sickened enough when John Kerry had to suffer through that. I am pleased that the Obama campaign choose not to do

Watch This and pass it on!

http://www.atlah.org/broadcast/ndnr09-03-08.html